Publication Date
| In 2025 | 2 |
| Since 2024 | 2 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Artificial Intelligence | 2 |
| Computer Software | 2 |
| Student Attitudes | 2 |
| Teaching Methods | 2 |
| Technology Integration | 2 |
| Algorithms | 1 |
| Assignments | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Course Evaluation | 1 |
| Critical Theory | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Thresholds in Education | 2 |
Author
| Anaelle Emma Gackiere | 1 |
| Daniel A. Guberman | 1 |
| David B. Nelson | 1 |
| Guy J. Krueger | 1 |
| Samantha Elizabeth LeGrand | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textGuy J. Krueger – Thresholds in Education, 2025
Generative AI has become a quotidian discussion topic in many writing departments, and the conversations often focus on the negative aspects or the disruptions it has caused. A growing number of teachers and scholars, though, have embraced the new technology and welcomed it into their classrooms. In the Spring 2024 semester, students in my…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Technology Integration
David B. Nelson; Anaelle Emma Gackiere; Samantha Elizabeth LeGrand; Daniel A. Guberman – Thresholds in Education, 2025
In response to the significant disruption posed by emergent AI technology, we propose a four part framework for teaching and learning practice and development. Rather than focus on the specific technologies of the moment, this framework provides actionable suggestions for individuals with varying views of AI and its positive and negative…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Learning Processes, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence
