Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Author
| Boyer, Caroline E. | 1 |
| Curby, Timothy W. | 1 |
| Freidenberg, Rolfe Jr. | 1 |
| Gadzichowski, K. Marinka | 1 |
| Gallington, Deborah A. | 1 |
| Kelly, Martin G. | 1 |
| Kidd, Julie K. | 1 |
| Machado, Jessica A. | 1 |
| Pasnak, Robert | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Preschool Education | 1 |
Audience
| Students | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKidd, Julie K.; Curby, Timothy W.; Boyer, Caroline E.; Gadzichowski, K. Marinka; Gallington, Deborah A.; Machado, Jessica A.; Pasnak, Robert – Early Education and Development, 2012
Research Findings: A total of 72 Head Start children (M age = 53.26 months, SD = 5.07) were randomly assigned to 4 conditions. Some were taught the oddity principle (choosing the object that differs from others in a group) and seriation (ordering objects on a dimension and inserting new objects into such orders), which are forms of thinking that…
Descriptors: Art Activities, Disadvantaged Youth, Economically Disadvantaged, Cognitive Development
Download full textFreidenberg, Rolfe Jr.; Kelly, Martin G. – Online Submission, 2004
This research compared the outcomes of teaching middle school students two different methods of classification and phylogeny. Two classes were randomly selected and taught using traditional methods of instruction. Three classes were taught using the "Pseudozoid" approach, where students learned to classify, develop and read dichotomous keys, and…
Descriptors: Middle School Students, Test Results, Teaching Methods, Classification
