Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
Alcock, Lara | 1 |
Bishop, Pamela R. | 1 |
Gross, Louis J. | 1 |
Jones, Ian | 1 |
Lenhart, Suzanne | 1 |
Noroozi, Omid, Ed. | 1 |
Sahin, Ismail, Ed. | 1 |
Sturner, Kelly | 1 |
Taylor, Robin T. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Books | 1 |
Collected Works - General | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Albania | 1 |
Australia | 1 |
Ghana | 1 |
Indonesia | 1 |
Iran | 1 |
Kazakhstan | 1 |
Morocco | 1 |
Netherlands | 1 |
Philippines | 1 |
Singapore | 1 |
Tunisia | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Taylor, Robin T.; Bishop, Pamela R.; Lenhart, Suzanne; Gross, Louis J.; Sturner, Kelly – CBE - Life Sciences Education, 2020
We describe the development and initial validity assessment of the 20-item BioCalculus Assessment (BCA), with the objective of comparing undergraduate life science students' understanding of calculus concepts in different courses with alternative emphases (with and without focus on biological applications). The development process of the BCA…
Descriptors: Test Construction, Mathematics Tests, Calculus, Test Validity
Noroozi, Omid, Ed.; Sahin, Ismail, Ed. – International Society for Technology, Education, and Science, 2022
Education, science, and technology disciplines are closely and extensively connected in all formats and levels. The outbreak of COVID-19 has further squeezed this interconnection where the delivery of education in different scientific fields of studies at all education levels is almost impossible without the presence of technology. Today, there is…
Descriptors: Education, Sciences, Technology, COVID-19
Jones, Ian; Alcock, Lara – Studies in Higher Education, 2014
Peer assessment typically requires students to judge peers' work against assessment criteria. We tested an alternative approach in which students judged pairs of scripts against one another in the absence of assessment criteria. First year mathematics undergraduates (N?=?194) sat a written test on conceptual understanding of multivariable…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Alternative Assessment, Undergraduate Students