NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Researchers2
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 21 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Naples, Adam; Tenenbaum, Elena J.; Jones, Richard N.; Righi, Giulia; Sheinkopf, Stephen J.; Eigsti, Inge-Marie – Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 2023
Approximately 30% of autistic children are considered minimally verbal. The field lacks an efficient and reliable measure of communicative capacity among minimally verbal autistic children. Improved methods are needed to determine which children are at greatest risk for minimally verbal outcomes to better target interventions. Here, we present the…
Descriptors: Autism Spectrum Disorders, Young Children, Communication Skills, Verbal Communication
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Smith, Christopher J.; Pollard, Elena; Stein, Alexander J.; Ober-Reynolds, Sharman; Kirwan, Janet; Malligo, Amanda; Matthews, Nicole L.; Openden, Daniel; Melmed, Raun D. – Journal of Applied School Psychology, 2015
Schools regularly screen students for hearing and vision impairments because they present impediments to academic progress. For the same reason, schools should consider adding a universal screening for social challenges, which may also impede the learning process. This study reports on the development of the Social Challenges Screening…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Screening Tests, Questionnaires, Interpersonal Competence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chang, Mei; Paulson, Sharon E.; Finch, W. Holmes; Mcintosh, David E.; Rothlisberg, Barbara A. – Psychology in the Schools, 2014
This study examined the underlying constructs measured by the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities, Third Edition (WJ-III COG) and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition (SB5), based on the Cattell-Horn-Carrol (CHC) theory of cognitive abilities. This study reports the results of the first joint confirmatory factor analysis…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Intelligence Tests, Preschool Children, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Oakland, Thomas; Wechsler, Solange Muglia – International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 2016
This article provides guidelines for an entry-level course that prepares psychology students and practitioners to acquire entry-level skills, abilities, knowledge, and attitudes important to the individual assessment of intellectual abilities of children and youth. The article reviews prominent international, regional, and national policies,…
Descriptors: Guidelines, Intelligence Tests, School Psychology, School Psychologists
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Layton, Frances – Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1973
Purpose of this study was to test a short version of the Stanford-Binet, Form L-M using a group covering a wide age and ability level in an attempt to reduce the time factor involved in administration of some of the S-B tests, without sacrificing the reported accuracy. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Scoring Formulas, Tables (Data), Test Construction
Anderson, Zola; And Others – 1983
The study examined the effect of test modifications on the performance of 10 handicapped preschoolers on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (Form L-M). Adaptations of both stimulus and response modes were designed and constructed for subtests at the preschool levels on the Stanford-Binet. Attempts were made to maintain the functional…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Intelligence Tests, Preschool Education, Test Construction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
DiStefano, Christine; Dombrowski, Stefan C. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2006
The fifth edition of the Stanford-Binet test went through significant reformulation of its item content, administration format, standardization procedures, and theoretical structure. Additionally, the test was revised to measure five factors important to intelligence across both verbal and nonverbal domains. To better understand these substantial…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Test Construction, Factor Structure, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reckase, Mark D. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1989
Requirements for adaptive testing are reviewed, and the reasons implementation has taken so long are explored. The adaptive test is illustrated through the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale of L. M. Terman and M. A. Merrill (1960). Current adaptive testing is tied to the development of item response theory. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Educational Development, Elementary Secondary Education, Latent Trait Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bloom, Allan S.; And Others – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1977
The purpose of this research was to expand the criteria for the efficacy of the three short forms of the Standford-Binet Intelligence Scale to a consideration of individual differences in intelligence classification. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Children, Developmental Psychology, Intelligence Quotient, Measurement Instruments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cudeck, Robert; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1980
Tailored testing by Cliff's method of implied orders was simulated through the use of responses gathered during conventional administration of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale. Tailoring eliminated approximately half the responses with only modest decreases in score reliability. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Robinson, Nancy M. – Roeper Review, 1992
This paper presents a rationale for adopting the new form of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales for use with gifted children, based on its more recent norms, its factorial structure, its less restrictive emphasis on g-factor intelligence and verbal reasoning, and its evenness in content from one age to another. (JDD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests
Coffman, William E. – 1986
Three new tests presented as alternatives to the Wechsler tests for children were described in earlier papers of this session. This discussion reviews the earlier papers and comments on the developed tests: (1) the Woodcock-Johnson test; (2) the new Stanford-Binet; and (3) the K-ABC. The Woodcock-Johnson battery, state-of-the-art applications of…
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Tests, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Silverman, Linda Kreger; Kearney, Katheryn – Roeper Review, 1992
The Stanford-Binet IV is compared to the original version and criticized for having less power to measure the high end of intelligence and for having norms that discriminate against gifted students. Strengths of the Stanford-Binet L-M are pointed out, and use of both scales for different purposes is recommended. (JDD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Thorndike, Robert L. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1977
The 1972 re-norming of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale for children from three to six years of age produced unusually high scores. When these children were retested three years later, some drop in scores was noted. Reasons for the initial scores and the score decline are discussed. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Early Childhood Education, Elementary Education
Minton, Henry L. – 1985
The association between Lewis M. Terman and the World Book Company is traced in order to gain insight about the role of test publishing in the testing movement. The test publisher assumes the position of an intermediary between the test developer and the educational administrator responsible for making decisions about test adoption. Terman began…
Descriptors: Ability Grouping, Armed Forces, Educational History, Educational Testing
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2