NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Haladyna, Thomas M.; Downing, Steven M. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1989
Results of 96 theoretical/empirical studies were reviewed to see if they support a taxonomy of 43 rules for writing multiple-choice test items. The taxonomy is the result of an analysis of 46 textbooks dealing with multiple-choice item writing. For nearly half of the rules, no research was found. (SLD)
Descriptors: Classification, Literature Reviews, Multiple Choice Tests, Test Construction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Haladyna, Thomas M. – Educational Horizons, 2006
This article argues that the validity of standardized achievement test-score interpretation and use is problematic; consequently, confidence and trust in such test scores may often be unwarranted. The problem is particularly severe in high-stakes situations. This essay provides a context for understanding standardized achievement testing, then…
Descriptors: Validity, Testing, Achievement Tests, Standardized Tests
Crehan, Kevin; Haladyna, Thomas M. – 1989
The present study involved the testing of two common multiple-choice item writing rules. A recent review of research revealed that much of the advice given for writing multiple-choice test items is based on experience and wisdom rather than on empirical research. The rules assessed in this study include: (1) the phrasing of the stem in the form of…
Descriptors: College Students, Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests, Psychology
Haladyna, Thomas M. – 1999
This book explains writing effective multiple-choice test items and studying responses to items to evaluate and improve them, two topics that are very important in the development of many cognitive tests. The chapters are: (1) "Providing a Context for Multiple-Choice Testing"; (2) "Constructed-Response and Multiple-Choice Item Formats"; (3)…
Descriptors: Constructed Response, Multiple Choice Tests, Test Construction, Test Format
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Crehan, Kevin; Haladyna, Thomas M. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1991
Two item-writing rules were tested: phrasing stems as questions versus partial sentences; and using the "none-of-the-above" option instead of a specific content option. Results with 228 college students do not support the use of either stem type and provide limited evidence to caution against the "none-of-the-above" option.…
Descriptors: College Students, Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests, Test Construction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Downing, Steven M.; Haladyna, Thomas M. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1997
An ideal process is outlined for test item development and the study of item responses to ensure that tests are sound. Qualitative and quantitative methods are used to assess the item-level validity evidence for high-stakes examinations. A checklist for assessment is provided. (SLD)
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Item Response Theory, Qualitative Research, Quality Control
Haladyna, Thomas M.; Downing, Steven M. – 1985
In this paper 45 item-writing rules for multiple-choice tests presented in textbooks on educational measurement in a previous study are identified. The current study presents a quantitative review of the literature with respect to the empirical and theoretical evaluation of these principles of item-writing. Fifty-six studies that addressed at…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Item Analysis, Multiple Choice Tests