NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stocking, Martha L.; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1993
A method of automatically selecting items for inclusion in a test with constraints on item content and statistical properties was applied to real data. Tests constructed manually from the same data and constraints were compared to tests constructed automatically. Results show areas in which automated assembly can improve test construction. (SLD)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Automation, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reilly, Richard R.; Echternacht, Gary J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1979
Occupational interest scales and homogeneous scales were developed and compared on a sample of 3,072 Air Force personnel in a double cross-validation design. Results indicated that the occupational scales were slightly superior in correctly classifying satisified personnel v people in general. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Attitude Measures, Classification, Comparative Testing, Interest Inventories
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Barnes, Janet L.; Landy, Frank J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1979
Although behaviorally anchored rating scales have both intuitive and empirical appeal, they have not always yielded superior results in contrast with graphic rating scales. Results indicate that the choice of an anchoring procedure will depend on the nature of the actual rating process. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Comparative Testing, Higher Education, Rating Scales