Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Test Construction | 3 |
Test Reliability | 3 |
Test Validity | 3 |
Learning Disabilities | 2 |
Secondary School Students | 2 |
Adolescents | 1 |
At Risk Students | 1 |
Barriers | 1 |
Disability Identification | 1 |
Dyslexia | 1 |
Grade 1 | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Learning Disability Quarterly | 3 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Secondary Education | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 1 | 1 |
Grade 12 | 1 |
Grade 2 | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Kindergarten | 1 |
Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Peabody Picture Vocabulary… | 1 |
Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Amber E. DeBono; Kathy B. Ewoldt; Michele Heimbauer; Elizabeth A. Mendelsohn; Jonathan Cohen – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2025
Although many social-emotional learning (SEL) surveys exist for the general student population, students with learning disabilities (SwLD) are often excluded during the survey development process, and the current SEL surveys often overlook critical SEL competencies for SwLD (e.g., self-advocacy), necessitating an SEL survey for SwLD. To address…
Descriptors: Social Emotional Learning, Surveys, Students with Disabilities, Learning Disabilities
Daley, Samantha G.; Rappolt-Schlichtmann, Gabrielle – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2018
Being identified with a learning disability makes students vulnerable to experiences of stigmatization, which can be associated with negative academic and emotional effects. Yet, research with other vulnerable populations demonstrates that individual perceptions of stigmatization, or stigma consciousness, are not uniform and that variability in…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Social Bias, Social Attitudes, Self Concept
Fletcher, Jack M.; Francis, David J.; Foorman, Barbara R.; Schatschneider, Christopher – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2021
Many states now mandate early screening for dyslexia, but vary in how they address these mandates. There is confusion about the nature of screening versus diagnostic assessments, risk versus diagnosis, concurrent versus predictive validity, and inattention to indices of classification accuracy as the basis for determining risk. To help define what…
Descriptors: Dyslexia, Disability Identification, Screening Tests, Item Response Theory