Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Cheating | 1 |
| Colleges | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Educational Technology | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Online Courses | 1 |
| Student Evaluation | 1 |
| Test Construction | 1 |
Source
| Campus Technology | 1 |
Author
| Briggs, Linda L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkBriggs, Linda L. – Campus Technology, 2013
When it comes to secure testing online, even high-tech solutions rely on an old standby: a human proctor. This article asks the question: Is such an approach sustainable in the long run? A student labors over a midterm exam while a vigilant proctor peers over his shoulder, watching for any sign of cheating. It sounds like a tableau from a century…
Descriptors: Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
