NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
National Center on Educational Outcomes, 2012
Inclusive large-scale assessments have become the norm in states across the U.S. Participation rates of students with disabilities in these assessments have increased dramatically since the mid-1990s. As consortia of states move toward the development and implementation of assessment systems that include both non-summative assessments and…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Disabilities, Measurement, Test Construction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Bechard, Sue; Sheinker, Jan; Abell, Rosemary; Barton, Karen; Burling, Kelly; Camacho, Christopher; Cameto, Renee; Haertel, Geneva; Hansen, Eric; Johnstone, Chris; Kingston, Neal; Murray, Elizabeth; Parker, Caroline E.; Redfield, Doris; Tucker, Bill – Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2010
This article represents one outcome from the "Invitational Research Symposium on Technology-Enabled and Universally Designed Assessments," which examined technology-enabled assessments (TEA) and universal design (UD) as they relate to students with disabilities (SWD). It was developed to stimulate research into TEAs designed to better understand…
Descriptors: Test Validity, Disabilities, Educational Change, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Huang, Yueh-Min; Lin, Yen-Ting; Cheng, Shu-Chen – Computers & Education, 2009
With the rapid growth of computer and mobile technology, it is a challenge to integrate computer based test (CBT) with mobile learning (m-learning) especially for formative assessment and self-assessment. In terms of self-assessment, computer adaptive test (CAT) is a proper way to enable students to evaluate themselves. In CAT, students are…
Descriptors: Self Evaluation (Individuals), Test Items, Formative Evaluation, Educational Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Leclercq, Dieudonne – European Journal of Education, 1980
Advancements in educational testing, especially in the computerized construction of tests from item banks, are outlined and explained. It is suggested that these methods open the door to more individualized and more formative type of testing. (MSE)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Oriented Programs, Formative Evaluation