Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Item Sampling | 4 |
Research Methodology | 4 |
Test Construction | 4 |
Academic Achievement | 2 |
Achievement Rating | 1 |
Attitude Measures | 1 |
Audits (Verification) | 1 |
Benchmarking | 1 |
Coding | 1 |
Data Analysis | 1 |
Databases | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 1 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Program for International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Leifeng Xiao; Kit-Tai Hau; Melissa Dan Wang – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2024
Short scales are time-efficient for participants and cost-effective in research. However, researchers often mistakenly expect short scales to have the same reliability as long ones without considering the effect of scale length. We argue that applying a universal benchmark for alpha is problematic as the impact of low-quality items is greater on…
Descriptors: Measurement, Benchmarking, Item Sampling, Sample Size
OECD Publishing (NJ1), 2012
The "PISA 2009 Technical Report" describes the methodology underlying the PISA 2009 survey. It examines additional features related to the implementation of the project at a level of detail that allows researchers to understand and replicate its analyses. The reader will find a wealth of information on the test and sample design,…
Descriptors: Quality Control, Research Reports, Research Methodology, Evaluation Criteria
Sirotnik, Ken – J Educ Meas, 1970
The assumption that an examinee's response to an item is independent of the context in which it occurs is tested. (PR)
Descriptors: Attitude Measures, Item Sampling, Measurement Techniques, Research Methodology
Kleinke, David J. – 1972
In a post-mortem study of item sampling, 1,050 examinees were divided into ten groups 50 times. Each time, their papers were scored on four different sets of item samples from a 150-item test of academic aptitude. These samples were selected using (a) unstratified random sampling and stratification on (b) content, (c) difficulty, and (d) both.…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Item Sampling, Predictive Validity, Research Methodology