Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Anatomy | 1 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Medical Education | 1 |
| Medical Students | 1 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 1 |
| Recall (Psychology) | 1 |
| Test Format | 1 |
| Test Validity | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Saudi Arabia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkShaibah, Hassan Sami; van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. – Anatomical Sciences Education, 2013
Traditionally, an anatomy practical examination is conducted using a free response format (FRF). However, this format is resource-intensive, as it requires a relatively large time investment from anatomy course faculty in preparation and grading. Thus, several interventions have been reported where the response format was changed to a selected…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Anatomy, Medical Education, Test Validity
