Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Discriminant Analysis | 7 |
| Test Format | 7 |
| Higher Education | 4 |
| Difficulty Level | 3 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 3 |
| Test Items | 3 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Item Analysis | 2 |
| Test Construction | 2 |
| Test Reliability | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Bay, Luz | 1 |
| Cheng, Liying | 1 |
| Federico, Pat-Anthony | 1 |
| Hanson, Bradley A. | 1 |
| Klinger, Don A. | 1 |
| Lancaster, Diana M. | 1 |
| Loomis, Susan Cooper | 1 |
| Melancon, Janet G. | 1 |
| Thompson, Bruce | 1 |
| Tollefson, Nona | 1 |
| Tripp, Alice | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 5 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| ACT Assessment | 1 |
| Embedded Figures Test | 1 |
| National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Zheng, Ying; Cheng, Liying; Klinger, Don A. – TESL Canada Journal, 2007
Large scale testing in English affects second-language students not only greatly but also differently than first-language learners. The research literature reports that confounding factors in such large-scale testing such as varying test formats may differentially affect the performance of students from diverse backgrounds. An investigation of…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Reading Tests, Test Format, Educational Testing
Tollefson, Nona; Tripp, Alice – 1986
The item difficulty and item discrimination of three multiple-choice item formats were compared in experimental and non-experimental settings. In the experimental study, 104 graduate students were randomly assigned to complete one of three forms of a multiple-choice test: (1) a complex alternative ("none of the above") as the correct answer; (2) a…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Difficulty Level, Discriminant Analysis, Graduate Students
Peer reviewedWaters, L. K.; And Others – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982
Multitrait-multimethod analysis was performed on instructors' ratings from behaviorally anchored rating scales, graphic rating scales, and mixed standard scales. Two samples of 100 undergraduate students were distinguished on the basis of whether the statements on the mixed-standard scale were behaviorally specific or more generic descriptions of…
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Discriminant Analysis, Higher Education, Interrater Reliability
Melancon, Janet G.; Thompson, Bruce – 1988
Applied classical measurement theory was used to study the measurement characteristics of Forms A and B of the Finding Embedded Figures Test (FEFT) when the test is administered in a "no-guessing" or "supply" format. Data provided by 69 students at a private university in the southern United States were used. Both forms of the…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level, Discriminant Analysis, Guessing (Tests)
Lancaster, Diana M.; And Others – 1987
Difficulty and discrimination ability were compared between multiple choice and short answer items in midterm and final examinations for the internal medicine course at Louisiana State University School of Dentistry. The examinations were administered to 67 sophomore dental students in that course. Additionally, the impact of the source of the…
Descriptors: Dental Schools, Dentistry, Difficulty Level, Discriminant Analysis
Hanson, Bradley A.; Bay, Luz; Loomis, Susan Cooper – 1998
Research studies using booklet classification were implemented by the American College Testing Program to investigate the linkage between the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Achievement Levels Descriptions and the cutpoints set to represent student performance with respect to the achievement levels. This paper describes the…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Classification, Cutting Scores, Discriminant Analysis
Federico, Pat-Anthony – 1989
To determine the relative reliabilities and validities of paper-based and computer-based measurement procedures, 83 male student pilots and radar intercept officers were administered computer and paper-based tests of aircraft recognition. The subject matter consisted of line drawings of front, side, and top silhouettes of aircraft. Reliabilities…
Descriptors: Armed Forces, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Discriminant Analysis

Direct link
