Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Adaptive Testing | 6 |
| Mathematical Models | 6 |
| Test Format | 6 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 5 |
| Test Construction | 4 |
| Difficulty Level | 3 |
| Latent Trait Theory | 3 |
| Test Items | 3 |
| Ability Identification | 2 |
| Algorithms | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Ackerman, Terry A. | 1 |
| Henly, Susan J. | 1 |
| Hsu, Tse-Chi | 1 |
| Kiely, Gerard L. | 1 |
| Kirisci, Levent | 1 |
| Luping Niu | 1 |
| Nicewander, W. Alan | 1 |
| Seung W. Choi | 1 |
| Wainer, Howard | 1 |
| Wim J. van der Linden | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 5 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| ACT Assessment | 1 |
| Differential Aptitude Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkWim J. van der Linden; Luping Niu; Seung W. Choi – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2024
A test battery with two different levels of adaptation is presented: a within-subtest level for the selection of the items in the subtests and a between-subtest level to move from one subtest to the next. The battery runs on a two-level model consisting of a regular response model for each of the subtests extended with a second level for the joint…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Test Construction, Test Format, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedHenly, Susan J.; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1989
A group of covariance structure models was examined to ascertain the similarity between conventionally administered and computerized adaptive versions of the Differential Aptitude Test (DAT). Results for 332 students indicate that the computerized version of the DAT is an adequate representation of the conventional test battery. (TJH)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Nicewander, W. Alan; And Others – 1980
Two methods of interactive, computer-assisted testing methods for multiple-choice items were compared with each other and with conventional multiple-choice tests. The interactive testing methods compared were tailored testing and the respond-until-correct (RUC) item response method. In tailored testing, examinee ability is successively estimated…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Guessing (Tests)
Download full textAckerman, Terry A. – 1987
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of using multidimensional items in a computer adaptive test (CAT) setting which assumes a unidimensional item response theory (IRT) framework. Previous research has suggested that the composite of multidimensional abilities being estimated by a unidimensional IRT model is not constant…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Entrance Examinations, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Simulation
Kirisci, Levent; Hsu, Tse-Chi – 1992
A predictive adaptive testing (PAT) strategy was developed based on statistical predictive analysis, and its feasibility was studied by comparing PAT performance to those of the Flexilevel, Bayesian modal, and expected a posteriori (EAP) strategies in a simulated environment. The proposed adaptive test is based on the idea of using item difficulty…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Bayesian Statistics, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing
Wainer, Howard; Kiely, Gerard L. – 1986
Recent experience with the Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) has raised a number of concerns about its practical applications. The concerns are principally involved with the concept of having the computer construct the test from a precalibrated item pool, and substituting statistical characteristics for the test developer's skills. Problems with…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Computer Assisted Testing, Construct Validity
