Descriptor
| Comparative Testing | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Test Construction | 2 |
| Test Format | 2 |
| Test Reliability | 2 |
| Ability | 1 |
| Distractors (Tests) | 1 |
| Education Majors | 1 |
| Estimation (Mathematics) | 1 |
| Grade 12 | 1 |
| Graduate Students | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textTrevisan, Michael S.; Sax, Gilbert – 1991
The purpose of this study was to compare the reliabilities of two-, three-, four-, and five-choice tests using an incremental option paradigm. Test forms were created incrementally, a method approximating actual test construction procedures. Participants were 154 12th-grade students from the Portland (Oregon) area. A 45-item test with two options…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Distractors (Tests), Estimation (Mathematics), Grade 12
Chang, Lei – 1993
Equivalence in reliability and validity across 4-point and 6-point scales was assessed by fitting different measurement models through confirmatory factor analysis of a multitrait-multimethod covariance matrix. Responses to nine Likert-type items designed to measure perceived quantitative ability, self-perceived usefulness of quantitative…
Descriptors: Ability, Comparative Testing, Education Majors, Graduate Students
