Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Zhou, Jiawen; Cao, Yi – ETS Research Report Series, 2020
In this study, we explored retest effects on test scores and response time for repeaters, examinees who retake an examination. We looked at two groups of repeaters: those who took the same form twice and those who took different forms on their two attempts for a certification and licensure test. Scores improved over the two test attempts, and…
Descriptors: Testing, Test Items, Computer Assisted Testing, Licensing Examinations (Professions)
Taherbhai, Husein; Seo, Daeryong; Bowman, Trinell – British Educational Research Journal, 2012
Literature in the United States provides many examples of no difference in student achievement when measured against the mode of test administration i.e., paper-pencil and online versions of the test. However, most of these researches centre on "regular" students who do not require differential teaching methods or different evaluation…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Statistical Analysis, Teaching Methods, Test Format
Wise, Steven L.; And Others – 1997
The degree to which item review on a computerized adaptive test (CAT) could be used by examinees to inflate their scores artificially was studied. G. G. Kingsbury (1996) described a strategy in which examinees could use the changes in item difficulty during a CAT to determine which items' answers are incorrect and should be changed during item…
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Adaptive Testing, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing
Wise, Steven L. – 1996
In recent years, a controversy has arisen about the advisability of allowing examinees to review their test items and possibly change answers. Arguments for and against allowing item review are discussed, and issues that a test designer should consider when designing a Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) are identified. Most CATs do not allow…
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Error Correction