Descriptor
| Algebra | 3 |
| High School Students | 3 |
| High Schools | 3 |
| Mathematical Models | 3 |
| Mathematics Tests | 3 |
| Test Items | 3 |
| Cognitive Processes | 2 |
| Difficulty Level | 2 |
| Item Response Theory | 2 |
| Test Construction | 2 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Educational… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedWainer, Howard; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1991
Hierarchical (adaptive) and linear methods of testlet construction were compared. The performance of 2,080 ninth and tenth graders on a 4-item testlet was used to predict performance on the entire test. The adaptive test was slightly superior as a predictor, but the cost of obtaining that superiority was considerable. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Algebra, Comparative Testing, High School Students
Peer reviewedLane, Suzanne – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1991
The use of restricted item response models to test hypotheses regarding item difficulty ordering and slope uniformity was demonstrated in a study in which 597 algebra students were asked to solve word problems reflecting various types of cognitive processing. Benefits and limitations of the procedures are discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Algebra, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Tests
Medina-Diaz, Maria – 1992
The cognitive structure of an algebra test was defined and validated using the linear test model (LLTM) and quadratic assignment (QA) techniques. The LLTM is an extension of the Rasch model with a linear constraint that describes item difficulty in terms of the cognitive operations required to solve the item. The model permits the specification of…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Algebra, Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Structures


