Publication Date
In 2025 | 2 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 7 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 7 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Adaptive Testing | 31 |
Algorithms | 31 |
Test Items | 31 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 28 |
Item Banks | 12 |
Selection | 12 |
Test Construction | 11 |
Item Response Theory | 6 |
Simulation | 6 |
Ability | 5 |
Accuracy | 4 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 13 |
Journal Articles | 12 |
Reports - Evaluative | 11 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 8 |
Reports - Descriptive | 5 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 2 |
Collected Works - Serials | 1 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Netherlands | 1 |
New York (Rochester) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Armed Services Vocational… | 2 |
Graduate Record Examinations | 1 |
SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Harold Doran; Testsuhiro Yamada; Ted Diaz; Emre Gonulates; Vanessa Culver – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Computer adaptive testing (CAT) is an increasingly common mode of test administration offering improved test security, better measurement precision, and the potential for shorter testing experiences. This article presents a new item selection algorithm based on a generalized objective function to support multiple types of testing conditions and…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Algorithms
Pan, Yiqin; Livne, Oren; Wollack, James A.; Sinharay, Sandip – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2023
In computerized adaptive testing, overexposure of items in the bank is a serious problem and might result in item compromise. We develop an item selection algorithm that utilizes the entire bank well and reduces the overexposure of items. The algorithm is based on collaborative filtering and selects an item in two stages. In the first stage, a set…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Algorithms
Development of a High-Accuracy and Effective Online Calibration Method in CD-CAT Based on Gini Index
Tan, Qingrong; Cai, Yan; Luo, Fen; Tu, Dongbo – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2023
To improve the calibration accuracy and calibration efficiency of cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing (CD-CAT) for new items and, ultimately, contribute to the widespread application of CD-CAT in practice, the current article proposed a Gini-based online calibration method that can simultaneously calibrate the Q-matrix and item…
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Accuracy
Michael Bass; Scott Morris; Sheng Zhang – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2025
Administration of patient-reported outcome measures (PROs), using multidimensional computer adaptive tests (MCATs) has the potential to reduce patient burden, but the efficiency of MCAT depends on the degree to which an individual's responses fit the psychometric properties of the assessment. Assessing patients' symptom burden through the…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Patients, Outcome Measures
Gorgun, Guher; Bulut, Okan – Large-scale Assessments in Education, 2023
In low-stakes assessment settings, students' performance is not only influenced by students' ability level but also their test-taking engagement. In computerized adaptive tests (CATs), disengaged responses (e.g., rapid guesses) that fail to reflect students' true ability levels may lead to the selection of less informative items and thereby…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Algorithms
Yiqin Pan – ProQuest LLC, 2022
Item preknowledge refers to the phenomenon in which some examinees have access to live items before taking a test. It is one of the most common and significant concerns within the testing industry. Thus, various statistical methods have been proposed to detect item preknowledge in computerized linear or adaptive testing. However, the success of…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Prior Learning, Test Items, Algorithms
Hanif Akhtar – International Society for Technology, Education, and Science, 2023
For efficiency, Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) algorithm selects items with the maximum information, typically with a 50% probability of being answered correctly. However, examinees may not be satisfied if they only correctly answer 50% of the items. Researchers discovered that changing the item selection algorithms to choose easier items (i.e.,…
Descriptors: Success, Probability, Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing
Stocking, Martha L.; Lewis, Charles – 1995
The interest in the application of large-scale adaptive testing for secure tests has served to focus attention on issues that arise when theoretical advances are made operational. Many such issues in the application of large-scale adaptive testing for secure tests have more to do with changes in testing conditions than with testing paradigms. One…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Computer Assisted Testing
Veldkamp, Bernard P. – 2000
A mathematical programming approach is presented for computer adaptive testing (CAT) with many constraints on the item and test attributes. Because mathematical programming problems have to be solved while the examinee waits for the next item, a fast implementation of the Branch-and-Bound algorithm is needed for this approach. Eight modifications…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Construction

Eggen, T. J. H. M. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1999
Evaluates a method for item selection in adaptive testing that is based on Kullback-Leibler information (KLI) (T. Cover and J. Thomas, 1991). Simulation study results show that testing algorithms using KLI-based item selection perform better than or as well as those using Fisher information item selection. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Computer Assisted Testing, Selection
Krass, Iosif A.; Thomasson, Gary L. – 1999
New items are being calibrated for the next generation of the computerized adaptive (CAT) version of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) (Forms 5 and 6). The requirements that the items be "good" three-parameter logistic (3-PL) model items and typically "like" items in the previous CAT-ASVAB tests have…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Computer Assisted Testing, Nonparametric Statistics
Performance of Item Exposure Control Methods in Computerized Adaptive Testing: Further Explorations.
Chang, Shun-Wen; Ansley, Timothy N.; Lin, Sieh-Hwa – 2000
This study examined the effectiveness of the Sympson and Hetter conditional procedure (SHC), a modification of the Sympson and Hetter (1985) algorithm, in controlling the exposure rates of items in a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) environment. The properties of the procedure were compared with those of the Davey and Parshall (1995) and the…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Banks
Krass, Iosif A. – 1998
In the process of item calibration for a computerized adaptive test (CAT), many well-established calibrating packages show weakness in the estimation of item parameters. This paper introduces an on-line calibration algorithm based on the convexity of likelihood functions. This package consists of: (1) an algorithm that estimates examinee ability…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Computer Assisted Testing
Bowles, Ryan; Pommerich, Mary – 2001
Many arguments have been made against allowing examinees to review and change their answers after completing a computer adaptive test (CAT). These arguments include: (1) increased bias; (2) decreased precision; and (3) susceptibility of test-taking strategies. Results of simulations suggest that the strength of these arguments is reduced or…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Computer Assisted Testing, Review (Reexamination)

Schnipke, Deborah L.; Green, Bert F. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1995
Two item selection algorithms, one based on maximal differentiation between examinees and one based on item response theory and maximum information for each examinee, were compared in simulated linear and adaptive tests of cognitive ability. Adaptive tests based on maximum information were clearly superior. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Comparative Analysis, Item Response Theory