Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Adaptive Testing | 17 |
Comparative Testing | 17 |
Test Items | 17 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 15 |
Higher Education | 6 |
Difficulty Level | 5 |
Estimation (Mathematics) | 5 |
Mathematics Tests | 5 |
Test Anxiety | 5 |
Test Construction | 5 |
Test Length | 5 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Educational… | 4 |
Journal of Educational… | 2 |
Applied Psychological… | 1 |
Evaluation and the Health… | 1 |
International Journal of… | 1 |
Author
De Ayala, R. J. | 2 |
Wainer, Howard | 2 |
Wise, Steven L. | 2 |
Albanese, Mark A. | 1 |
Ankenman, Robert D. | 1 |
Bejar, Isaac I. | 1 |
Chen, Shu-Ying | 1 |
Davis-Dorsey, Judy | 1 |
DeAyala, R. J. | 1 |
Guo, Fanmin | 1 |
Han, Kyung T. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 12 |
Journal Articles | 9 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 6 |
Reports - Evaluative | 5 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Test Anxiety Inventory | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Talento-Miller, Eileen; Guo, Fanmin; Han, Kyung T. – International Journal of Testing, 2013
When power tests include a time limit, it is important to assess the possibility of speededness for examinees. Past research on differential speededness has examined gender and ethnic subgroups in the United States on paper and pencil tests. When considering the needs of a global audience, research regarding different native language speakers is…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, English, Scores

Rocklin, Thomas; O'Donnell, Angela M. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1987
An experiment was conducted that contrasted a variant of computerized adaptive testing, self-adapted testing, with two traditional tests. Participants completed a self-report of text anxiety and were randomly assigned to take one of the three tests of verbal ability. Subjects generally chose more difficult items as the test progressed. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level

Wainer, Howard; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1992
Computer simulations were run to measure the relationship between testlet validity and factors of item pool size and testlet length for both adaptive and linearly constructed testlets. Making a testlet adaptive yields only modest increases in aggregate validity because of the peakedness of the typical proficiency distribution. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Simulation
Chen, Shu-Ying; Ankenman, Robert D. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2004
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of four item selection rules--(1) Fisher information (F), (2) Fisher information with a posterior distribution (FP), (3) Kullback-Leibler information with a posterior distribution (KP), and (4) completely randomized item selection (RN)--with respect to the precision of trait estimation and the…
Descriptors: Test Length, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Selection
DeAyala, R. J.; Koch, William R. – 1987
A nominal response model-based computerized adaptive testing procedure (nominal CAT) was implemented using simulated data. Ability estimates from the nominal CAT were compared to those from a CAT based upon the three-parameter logistic model (3PL CAT). Furthermore, estimates from both CAT procedures were compared with the known true abilities used…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Simulation

Wainer, Howard; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1991
Hierarchical (adaptive) and linear methods of testlet construction were compared. The performance of 2,080 ninth and tenth graders on a 4-item testlet was used to predict performance on the entire test. The adaptive test was slightly superior as a predictor, but the cost of obtaining that superiority was considerable. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Algebra, Comparative Testing, High School Students

De Ayala, R. J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1992
A computerized adaptive test (CAT) based on the nominal response model (NR CAT) was implemented, and the performance of the NR CAT and a CAT based on the three-parameter logistic model was compared. The NR CAT produced trait estimates comparable to those of the three-parameter test. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Equations (Mathematics)
De Ayala, R. J. – 1992
One important and promising application of item response theory (IRT) is computerized adaptive testing (CAT). The implementation of a nominal response model-based CAT (NRCAT) was studied. Item pool characteristics for the NRCAT as well as the comparative performance of the NRCAT and a CAT based on the three-parameter logistic (3PL) model were…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Simulation
Powell, Z. Emily – 1992
Little research exists on the psychological impacts of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and how it may affect test performance. Three CAT procedures were examined, in which items were selected to match students' achievement levels, from the item pool at random, or according to student choice of item difficulty levels. Twenty-four graduate…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Kim, Haeok; Plake, Barbara S. – 1993
A two-stage testing strategy is one method of adapting the difficulty of a test to an individual's ability level in an effort to achieve more precise measurement. A routing test provides an initial estimate of ability level, and a second-stage measurement test then evaluates the examinee further. The measurement accuracy and efficiency of item…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Roos, Linda L.; And Others – 1992
Computerized adaptive (CA) testing uses an algorithm to match examinee ability to item difficulty, while self-adapted (SA) testing allows the examinee to choose the difficulty of his or her items. Research comparing SA and CA testing has shown that examinees experience lower anxiety and improved performance with SA testing. All previous research…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adaptive Testing, Algebra, Algorithms
Pine, Steven M.; Weiss, David J. – 1978
This report examines how selection fairness is influenced by the characteristics of a selection instrument in terms of its distribution of item difficulties, level of item discrimination, degree of item bias, and testing strategy. Computer simulation was used in the administration of either a conventional or Bayesian adaptive ability test to a…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Bayesian Statistics, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing

Kent, Thomas H.; Albanese, Mark A. – Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1987
Two types of computer-administered unit quizzes in a systematic pathology course for second-year medical students were compared. Quizzes composed of questions selected on the basis of a student's ability had higher correlations with the final examination than did quizzes composed of questions randomly selected from topic areas. (Author/JAZ)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level

Wise, Steven L.; And Others – 1993
A new testing strategy that provides protection against the problem of having examinees in adaptive testing choose difficulty levels that are not matched to their proficiency levels was introduced and evaluated. The method, termed restricted self-adapted testing (RSAT), still provides examinees with a degree of control over the difficulty levels…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing

Davis-Dorsey, Judy; And Others – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1991
The impact of personalizing mathematical word problems and rewording them for explicitness was tested with 68 second and 59 fifth graders. Second graders benefited from personalization and rewording in combination; fifth graders benefited from personalization, not rewording. Personalization makes problems more motivating and easier to represent…
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Adaptive Testing, Age Differences, Comparative Testing
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2