Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Data Analysis | 3 |
Test Items | 3 |
Test Theory | 3 |
Test Bias | 2 |
Achievement Rating | 1 |
Aptitude Tests | 1 |
Art Education | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Computer Software | 1 |
Creativity | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Allen, Nancy L. | 1 |
Armstrong, Amy J. | 1 |
Blair, Bernadette | 1 |
Holland, Paul W. | 1 |
Kolakowsky-Hayner, Stephanie… | 1 |
Lewis, Allen N. | 1 |
Orr, Susan | 1 |
Reid, Christine A. | 1 |
Thayer, Dorothy T. | 1 |
Yorke, Mantz | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - General | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Counselors | 1 |
Location
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
General Aptitude Test Battery | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Yorke, Mantz; Orr, Susan; Blair, Bernadette – Studies in Higher Education, 2014
There has long been the suspicion amongst staff in Art & Design that the ratings given to their subject disciplines in the UK's National Student Survey are adversely affected by a combination of circumstances--a "perfect storm". The "perfect storm" proposition is tested by comparing ratings for Art & Design with those…
Descriptors: Student Surveys, National Surveys, Art Education, Design
Reid, Christine A.; Kolakowsky-Hayner, Stephanie A.; Lewis, Allen N.; Armstrong, Amy J. – Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 2007
Item response theory (IRT) methodology is introduced as a tool for improving assessment instruments used with people who have disabilities. Need for this approach in rehabilitation is emphasized; differences between IRT and classical test theory are clarified. Concepts essential to understanding IRT are defined, necessary data assumptions are…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Methods, Item Response Theory, Aptitude Tests
Allen, Nancy L.; Holland, Paul W.; Thayer, Dorothy T. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2005
Allowing students to choose the question(s) that they will answer from among several possible alternatives is often viewed as a mechanism for increasing fairness in certain types of assessments. The fairness of optional topic choice is not a universally accepted fact, however, and various studies have been done to assess this question. We examine…
Descriptors: Test Theory, Test Items, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods