Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
Alhadi, Moosa A. A. | 1 |
Bowman, Trinell | 1 |
Huynh, Huynh | 1 |
Kim, Do-Hong | 1 |
Maher, Carolyn A. | 1 |
Seo, Daeryong | 1 |
Taherbhai, Husein | 1 |
Wang, Ting | 1 |
Zhang, Dake | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Grade 9 | 1 |
Kindergarten | 1 |
Primary Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Alhadi, Moosa A. A.; Zhang, Dake; Wang, Ting; Maher, Carolyn A. – North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2022
This research synthesizes studies that used a Digitalized Interactive Component (DIC) to assess K-12 student mathematics performance during Computer-based-Assessments (CBAs) in mathematics. A systematic search identified ten studies that categorized existing DICs according to the tools that provided language assistance to students and tools that…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Mathematics Tests, English Language Learners, Geometry
Taherbhai, Husein; Seo, Daeryong; Bowman, Trinell – British Educational Research Journal, 2012
Literature in the United States provides many examples of no difference in student achievement when measured against the mode of test administration i.e., paper-pencil and online versions of the test. However, most of these researches centre on "regular" students who do not require differential teaching methods or different evaluation…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Statistical Analysis, Teaching Methods, Test Format
Kim, Do-Hong; Huynh, Huynh – Educational Assessment, 2010
This study investigated whether scores obtained from the online and paper-and-pencil administrations of the statewide end-of-course English test were equivalent for students with and without disabilities. Score comparability was evaluated by examining equivalence of factor structure (measurement invariance) and differential item and bundle…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Language Tests, English, Scores