NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Russell, Michael; Moncaleano, Sebastian – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2020
Although both content alignment and standard-setting procedures rely on content-expert panel judgements, only the latter employs discussion among panel members. This study employed a modified form of the Webb methodology to examine content alignment for twelve tests administered as part of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS).…
Descriptors: Test Content, Test Items, Discussion, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schulz, E. Matthew – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
In this article, E. Matthew Schulz responds to Adam Wyse's article, "Construct Maps as a Foundation for Standard Setting." In doing so, he asserts that one of the most important ideas in Wyse's work is that information used in standard setting needs to be better represented through the use of graphics. However, he's not…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Item Response Theory, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Buckendahl, Chad W.; Ferdous, Abdullah A.; Gerrow, Jack – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2010
Many testing programs face the practical challenge of having limited resources to conduct comprehensive standard setting studies. Some researchers have suggested that replicating a group's recommended cut score on a full-length test may be possible by using a subset of the items. However, these studies were based on simulated data. This study…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Test Items, Standard Setting (Scoring), Methods