Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Methods | 3 |
Test Items | 3 |
Test Theory | 3 |
Item Response Theory | 2 |
Aptitude Tests | 1 |
Computer Software | 1 |
Criterion Referenced Tests | 1 |
Data Analysis | 1 |
Disabilities | 1 |
Educational Testing | 1 |
Error of Measurement | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Armstrong, Amy J. | 1 |
Kolakowsky-Hayner, Stephanie… | 1 |
Lewis, Allen N. | 1 |
Li, Feifei | 1 |
Mellenbergh, Gideon J. | 1 |
Reid, Christine A. | 1 |
van der Linden, Wim J. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - General | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Grade 3 | 1 |
Audience
Counselors | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
General Aptitude Test Battery | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Li, Feifei – ETS Research Report Series, 2017
An information-correction method for testlet-based tests is introduced. This method takes advantage of both generalizability theory (GT) and item response theory (IRT). The measurement error for the examinee proficiency parameter is often underestimated when a unidimensional conditional-independence IRT model is specified for a testlet dataset. By…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Generalizability Theory, Tests, Error of Measurement
Reid, Christine A.; Kolakowsky-Hayner, Stephanie A.; Lewis, Allen N.; Armstrong, Amy J. – Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 2007
Item response theory (IRT) methodology is introduced as a tool for improving assessment instruments used with people who have disabilities. Need for this approach in rehabilitation is emphasized; differences between IRT and classical test theory are clarified. Concepts essential to understanding IRT are defined, necessary data assumptions are…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Methods, Item Response Theory, Aptitude Tests
Mellenbergh, Gideon J.; van der Linden, Wim J. – Evaluation in Education: International Progress, 1982
Three item selection methods for criterion-referenced tests are examined: the classical theory of item difficulty and item-test correlation; the latent trait theory of item characteristic curves; and a decision-theoretic approach for optimal item selection. Item contribution to the standardized expected utility of mastery testing is discussed. (CM)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Testing, Item Analysis, Latent Trait Theory