Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Reading Comprehension | 3 |
Reading Tests | 3 |
Test Items | 3 |
Timed Tests | 3 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Multiple Choice Tests | 2 |
Reading Ability | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Achievement Tests | 1 |
Cognitive Ability | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
De Boeck, Paul | 1 |
Goldhammer, Frank | 1 |
Hahnel, Carolin | 1 |
Kroehne, Ulf | 1 |
Lifson, Steve | 1 |
Scruggs, Thomas E. | 1 |
Zhang, Hanmu | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Secondary Education | 2 |
High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Comprehensive Tests of Basic… | 1 |
Program for International… | 1 |
Stanford Achievement Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Goldhammer, Frank; Kroehne, Ulf; Hahnel, Carolin; De Boeck, Paul – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2021
Efficiency in reading component skills is crucial for reading comprehension, as efficient subprocesses do not extensively consume limited cognitive resources, making them available for comprehension processes. Cognitive efficiency is typically measured with speeded tests of relatively easy items. Observed responses and response times indicate the…
Descriptors: Reading Rate, Reading Comprehension, Cognitive Ability, Reading Tests
Zhang, Hanmu; Zhang, Hanmu – Journal of Education and Learning, 2019
Since understanding reading assignments is important to succeeding in school, improving the way that text is arranged in books would be an efficient way to help students better understand the material and perform well on tests. In this study, we asked students to read two original and two rearranged historical passages, in which rephrased…
Descriptors: Test Items, Textbook Preparation, Retention (Psychology), Recall (Psychology)
Scruggs, Thomas E.; Lifson, Steve – 1984
The ability to correctly answer reading comprehension test items, without having read the accompanying reading passage, was compared for third grade learning disabled students and their peers from a regular classroom. In the first experiment, fourteen multiple choice items were selected from the Stanford Achievement Test. No reading passages were…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Elementary School Students, Grade 3, Guessing (Tests)