Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Adaptive Testing | 2 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Psychometrics | 2 |
| Test Reliability | 2 |
| Efficiency | 1 |
| Item Response Theory | 1 |
| Junior High School Students | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Listening | 1 |
| Music | 1 |
| Simulation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Applied Measurement in… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkEdwards, Michael C.; Flora, David B.; Thissen, David – Applied Measurement in Education, 2012
This article describes a computerized adaptive test (CAT) based on the uniform item exposure multi-form structure (uMFS). The uMFS is a specialization of the multi-form structure (MFS) idea described by Armstrong, Jones, Berliner, and Pashley (1998). In an MFS CAT, the examinee first responds to a small fixed block of items. The items comprising…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Format, Test Items
Peer reviewedVispoel, Walter P.; Coffman, Don D. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1994
Computerized-adaptive (CAT) and self-adapted (SAT) music listening tests were compared for efficiency, reliability, validity, and motivational benefits with 53 junior high school students. Results demonstrate trade-offs, with greater potential motivational benefits for SAT and greater efficiency for CAT. SAT elicited more favorable responses from…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Efficiency, Item Response Theory
