Descriptor
| Comparative Testing | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Test Reliability | 2 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Answer Keys | 1 |
| Behavior Rating Scales | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Item Analysis | 1 |
| Predictive Validity | 1 |
| Rating Scales | 1 |
| Raw Scores | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Applied Psychological… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBarnes, Janet L.; Landy, Frank J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1979
Although behaviorally anchored rating scales have both intuitive and empirical appeal, they have not always yielded superior results in contrast with graphic rating scales. Results indicate that the choice of an anchoring procedure will depend on the nature of the actual rating process. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Comparative Testing, Higher Education, Rating Scales
Peer reviewedDowney, Ronald G. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1979
This research attempted to interrelate several methods of producing option weights (i.e., Guttman internal and external weights and judges' weights) and examined their effects on reliability and on concurrent, predictive, and face validity. It was concluded that option weighting offered limited, if any, improvement over unit weighting. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Answer Keys, Comparative Testing, High Schools


