Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 2 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 6 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 13 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 24 |
Descriptor
Source
| Assessment & Evaluation in… | 27 |
Author
| Yin, Hongbiao | 3 |
| Lu, Genshu | 2 |
| Afonso, Raquel Rocha | 1 |
| Aghazadeh, Fereydoun | 1 |
| Akimov, Alexandr | 1 |
| Aliza J. Aldana | 1 |
| Amirhossein Rasooli | 1 |
| Aruguete, Mara | 1 |
| Barak, Miri | 1 |
| Barwell, Fred | 1 |
| Beran, Tanya | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 27 |
| Reports - Research | 24 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 21 |
| Postsecondary Education | 13 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
| Two Year Colleges | 1 |
Audience
| Policymakers | 1 |
| Students | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| ACT Assessment | 1 |
| California Critical Thinking… | 1 |
| California Critical Thinking… | 1 |
| Cornell Critical Thinking Test | 1 |
| SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
| Watson Glaser Critical… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkBarak, Miri; Watted, Abeer; Haick, Hossam – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2020
The goal of this study was to establish the validity and reliability of a self-report tool for assessing individual differences in innovative thinking, based on a modification of the 'innovative behavior scale'. A five-stage study was conducted among engineering students worldwide, who enrolled in a massive open online course in Nanotechnology and…
Descriptors: Test Validity, Test Reliability, Individual Differences, Innovation
Yin, Hongbiao – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2023
With a sample of 4,646 undergraduate students from four universities in China, this study examined the psychometric qualities of a newly-adapted measurement, namely, the Online Motivation and Engagement Scale for university and college students, and investigated the characteristics of and differences in Chinese students' motivation and engagement…
Descriptors: Learner Engagement, Online Courses, Educational Technology, COVID-19
Corradi, David – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2023
Juries are a high-stake practice in higher education to assess complex competencies. However common, research remains behind in detailing the psychometric qualities of juries, especially when using rubrics or rating scales as an assessment tool. In this study, I analyze a case of a jury assessment (N = 191) of product development where both…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Educational Practices, Higher Education, Rating Scales
Luo, Jiahui; Chan, Cecilia K. Y.; Zhao, Yue – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2023
Intensive research attention has focused on developing students' evaluative judgement within the higher education curriculum, but little has addressed how it can be measured. The contextual nature of evaluative judgement makes it difficult to generate an encompassing instrument, highlighting the need for situated measurement tools. Against this…
Descriptors: Engineering Education, Higher Education, Evaluative Thinking, Intercultural Communication
Thomas A. O'Neill; Aliza J. Aldana; Jose A. Espinoza; McKenna P. Sperry; Kyle M. Brykman; Magda B. L. Donia – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
Teamwork skills are foundational for career success and student learning in group projects. One of the major challenges of teamwork involves managing conflict among team members. In the current research, we develop a conflict management styles (CMS) psychometric inventory that assesses students' levels of the five styles of managing conflict based…
Descriptors: Conflict Resolution, Feedback (Response), Teamwork, Psychometrics
Amirhossein Rasooli; Jim Turner; Tünde Varga-Atkins; Edd Pitt; Shaghayegh Asgari; Will Moindrot – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2025
Groupwork is a crucial aspect of work contexts and a key twenty first century skill. Assessment of groupwork provides a persistent challenge for educators in university contexts with students reporting experiences of unfairness from their peers during groupwork. This study developed a novel Peer Assessment Fairness Instrument to explore factors…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Undergraduate Students, Student Attitudes, College Faculty
Yin, Hongbiao; Lu, Genshu; Meng, Xuanyi – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
This paper reports two consecutive studies investigating Chinese students' course experiences of online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. With a sample of 2,894 undergraduate students from 12 universities, Study one adapted the Course Experience Questionnaire in the context of online teaching and learning, and provided some evidence…
Descriptors: Online Courses, Student Experience, COVID-19, Pandemics
Martins, Maria João; Reis Marques, Tiago; Laíns, Inês; Leal, Inês; Pessanha, Inês; Brochado, Bruno; Oliveira Santos, Manuel; Pinto Teixeira, Pedro; Fernandes, Diogo Hipólito; Silva, João Carlos; Sampaio, Filipa Almeida; Brandão, Mariana; Morais, Inês; Laranjinha, Inês; Teixeira, Nelson; Fernandes, Tiago; Carneiro, Diogo; Calvão, Joana; Pratas, Miguel; Palmela, Carolina; Lima, António; Pires, Guilherme; Reis, Joel; Raimundo, Miguel; Afonso, Raquel Rocha; Costa e Silva, Miguel; Quintas, Catarina; Rodrigues, Tiago M.; Coelho, Nuno Henriques; Ramos, Sónia Afonso; Policiano, Catarina; Rato, Catarina; Faria, Daniel Candeias; Lopes, Alice; Rodrigues, Joana Ramos; Ferreira, Afonso Nunes; Costeira, Filipa de Sousa; Marques, Renata; Cordeiro, Hugo; Richardson, John T. E. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019
The UK National Student Survey (NSS) is a sound and widely used instrument for assessing students' academic experiences. We aimed to translate the NSS for Portuguese students and to validate the instrument in a sample of medical undergraduates. The research team translated and adapted the NSS for Portuguese students (NSS-P). The survey was…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, National Surveys, Student Surveys, Medical Students
Rear, David – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019
In today's market-driven educational culture, universities are coming under increasing pressure to justify funding through the disclosure of measurable outcomes in education and research. One educational objective that receives particular attention is critical thinking, regarded as an essential skill in both academic and work environments. The…
Descriptors: Critical Thinking, Standardized Tests, Outcomes of Education, Educational Objectives
Martínez-Huertas, José Á.; Jastrzebska, Olga; Olmos, Ricardo; León, José A. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019
Automated summary evaluation is proposed as an alternative to rubrics and multiple-choice tests in knowledge assessment. Inbuilt rubric is a recent Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) method that implements rubrics in an artificially-generated semantic space. It was compared with classical LSA's cosine-based methods assessing knowledge in a…
Descriptors: Automation, Scoring Rubrics, Alternative Assessment, Test Reliability
Akimov, Alexandr; Malin, Mirela – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2020
Assessment is an important element of any effective teaching and learning strategy. Designing an appropriate assessment strategy is a continual challenge for instructors because the assessment structure must be well aligned with the intended learning outcomes. Technological advances have led to an expansion of online and distance modes of course…
Descriptors: Verbal Tests, Oral Language, Student Evaluation, Computer Assisted Testing
Bergsmann, Evelyn; Klug, Julia; Burger, Christoph; Först, Nora; Spiel, Christiane – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018
There is a lively discussion on how to evaluate competence-based higher education in both evaluation and competence research. The instruments used are often limited to course evaluation or specific competences, taking a rather narrow perspective. Furthermore, the instruments often comprise predetermined competences that cannot be adapted to higher…
Descriptors: Questionnaires, Minimum Competency Testing, Screening Tests, Higher Education
Zhao, Jing; Gallant, Dorinda J. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2012
Many personnel committees at colleges and universities in the USA use student evaluation of faculty instruction to make decisions regarding tenure, promotion, merit pay or faculty professional development. This study examines the construct validity and internal consistency reliability of the student evaluation of instruction (SEI) used at a large…
Descriptors: Evidence, Undergraduate Students, Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance, Construct Validity
Juniper, Bridget; Walsh, Elaine; Richardson, Alan; Morley, Bernard – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2012
This study describes the development of an assessment to evaluate the well-being of PhD researchers using a clinically approved methodology that places the perceptions and experiences of the subject population at the heart of its construction. It identifies and assesses the range and relative importance of seven distinct dimensions which are shown…
Descriptors: Test Validity, Content Validity, Researchers, Well Being
Cumming, Jennifer; Woodcock, Charlotte; Cooley, Sam J.; Holland, Mark J. G.; Burns, Victoria E. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2015
The aim of the present study was to develop and provide psychometric evidence in support of the groupwork skills questionnaire (GSQ) for measuring task and interpersonal groupwork skills. A 46-item version of the GSQ was initially completed by 672 university students. The number of items was reduced to 15 following exploratory factor analyses, and…
Descriptors: Questionnaires, Test Construction, Test Validity, Skills
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1 | 2
