NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 13 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Riviere, Michael S. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1973
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Intelligence Tests, Mental Retardation, Test Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pascale, Pietro J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1973
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Measurement Techniques, Preschool Children, Preschool Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kong, Xiaojing J.; Wise, Steven L.; Bhola, Dennison S. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2007
This study compared four methods for setting item response time thresholds to differentiate rapid-guessing behavior from solution behavior. Thresholds were either (a) common for all test items, (b) based on item surface features such as the amount of reading required, (c) based on visually inspecting response time frequency distributions, or (d)…
Descriptors: Test Items, Reaction Time, Timed Tests, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Roberts, Dennis M.; Reese, Clyde M. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1987
To investigate the claim that the Statistics Attitude Survey (SAS) contains a number of achievement-related items rather than attitude-related items, the SAS and the Attitudes Toward Statistics (ATS) were administered to 280 introductory statistics students. Results showed similarities between the tests. (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Attitude Measures, Comparative Testing, Grades (Scholastic), Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Long, Edgar C. J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1990
The development, preliminary assessment, and uses of two paper-and-pencil measures of dyadic perspective-taking are described. A literature review revealed 23 perspective-taking type items each for the Self Dyadic Perspective-Taking Scale and the Other Dyadic Perspective-Taking Scale. Results for 277 college students indicate that the tests are…
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Testing, Higher Education, Perspective Taking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stokes, Elizabeth H.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1978
The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, and the revised form of that measure, were administered to a sample of sixth grade pupils. Although the correlation between measures was high, scores on the revised form were significantly lower. (JKS)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Correlation, Error of Measurement, Grade 6
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Elliott, Stephen N.; Boeve, Kurtis – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1987
This investigation examined the three-year stability of WISC-R IQs for a balanced sample of Anglo, Black, and Mexican-American handicapped children. No significant differences in mean IQs were found across the three ethnic groups, although WISC-R Verbal and Performance IQs varied significantly over the test-retest period. (Author/BS)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Ethnic Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Burrell, Brenda; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1992
The reliability and validity of Child Abuse Potential Inventory (CAP) scores were investigated for 53 mothers of young children with disabilities and 60 mothers of young children without handicaps. Results generally support the integrity of CAP scores, although the random response subscale's reliability could be improved by omitting some items.…
Descriptors: Child Abuse, Comparative Testing, Disabilities, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Caruso, Grace-Ann L. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1992
Results from a pilot group of 22 parents of preschoolers and 96 parents of toddlers suggest that 3 developed measures of the supportive relationship between parents and child caregivers--the Caregiver Support Appraisal Scale-V, the Caregiver Support Appraisal Scale-P, and the Caregiver Supportive Behavior Scale--are valid and reliable measures.…
Descriptors: Child Caregivers, Comparative Testing, Construct Validity, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bandalos, Deborah; Benson, Jeri – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1990
The Computer Anxiety Scale was tested for invariance over the grouping conditions of males/females and graduate/undergraduate status. Subjects included 187 undergraduates and 188 graduates; analyses were conducted on 136 males and 236 females. Results indicate that the construct of computer anxiety appears to be multidimensional with highly…
Descriptors: Anxiety, Comparative Testing, Computers, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schriesheim, Chester A.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1991
Effects of item wording on questionnaire reliability and validity were studied, using 280 undergraduate business students who completed a questionnaire comprising 4 item types: (1) regular; (2) polar opposite; (3) negated polar opposite; and (4) negated regular. Implications of results favoring regular and negated regular items are discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Business Education, Comparative Testing, Higher Education, Negative Forms (Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Carver, Ronald P. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1992
Reliability and validity of a new measure of cognitive speed, the Speed of Thinking Test (SST), were investigated with 129 college students, who also completed a vocabulary test, a test of reading speed, and a test of reading comprehension. The SST appears to be a reliable and valid measure. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Tests, College Students, Comparative Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Trevisan, Michael S.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1991
The reliability and validity of multiple-choice tests were computed as a function of the number of options per item and student ability for 435 parochial high school juniors, who were administered the Washington Pre-College Test Battery. Results suggest the efficacy of the three-option item. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Comparative Testing, Distractors (Tests), Grade Point Average