Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 4 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 7 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 10 |
Descriptor
Adults | 25 |
Intelligence Tests | 25 |
Test Reliability | 25 |
Test Validity | 12 |
Scores | 6 |
Children | 5 |
Screening Tests | 5 |
Test Interpretation | 5 |
Error of Measurement | 4 |
Foreign Countries | 4 |
Intelligence Quotient | 4 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 21 |
Reports - Research | 17 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Netherlands | 2 |
Canada | 1 |
Egypt | 1 |
Finland | 1 |
Norway | 1 |
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ryan, Joseph J.; Gontkovsky, Samuel T. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2021
We analyzed data from the WASI-II manual to determine discrepancy score reliabilities of the Verbal Comprehension (VCI) and Perceptual Reasoning (PRI) indexes and the four subtests in the child and adult standardization samples. Reliabilities of the VCI-PRI discrepancy scores range from 0.78 to 0.86 for children and 0.82 to 0.89 for adults and…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Test Reliability, Scores, Children
Ryan, Joseph J.; Glass Umfleet, Laura; Gontkovsky, Samuel T. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2021
This investigation provides internal consistency reliabilities for the Wechsler Memory Scale--Fourth Edition (WMS-IV) subtest and index discrepancy scores using the standardization samples of the Adult and Older Adult batteries. Subtest reliabilities ranged from 0.00 to 0.93 for Adults and 0.25 to 0.94 for Older Adults. Three of 91 Adult…
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Memory, Adults, Intelligence Tests
Abdelhamid, Gomaa Said Mohamed; Gómez-Benito, Juana; Abdeltawwab, Ahmed Taha Mohamed; Abu Bakr, Mostafa Hafida Soliman; Kazem, Amina Mohamed – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2019
The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale--Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) is one of the most well-known tests in the field of adult intelligence assessment. This study explores the validity of the Egyptian adaptation for the subscales of the WAIS-IV. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the first-order, second-order, and bifactor models of both…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Adults, Foreign Countries, Test Validity
Hamadi, Layla; Fletcher, Helen K. – Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 2021
Attachment difficulties are associated with a range of adverse outcomes in mental health, and people with intellectual disabilities (IDs) may be at greater risk of experiencing difficulties in their attachment relationships. This review critically evaluated recent research measuring the prevalence of attachment difficulties in people with ID.…
Descriptors: Intellectual Disability, At Risk Persons, Adults, Adolescents
van Esch, Ankie Yvonne Maria; de Vries, Jolanda; Masthoff, Erik David Marco – Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 2020
Introduction: Intellectual disability is a key subject in all mental healthcare institutions, including the forensic mental health services. The Screener for Intelligence and Learning Disability (SCIL) is designed to screen for intellectual disability in forensic populations. So far, this assessment method is only validated in "detention fit…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Screening Tests, Disability Identification, Intellectual Disability
Stirk, Steven; Field, Bryony; Black, Jessica – Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 2018
Background: The Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire (LDSQ) has been shown to have high sensitivity and specificity to identify those who are likely to meet intellectual disability diagnostic criteria (McKenzie, et al. [McKenzie K., 2015]). However, there is no independent research to date to support these findings. Materials and Methods:…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Questionnaires, Screening Tests, Diagnostic Tests
Kaufman, Alan S. – Journal of Intelligence, 2021
U.S. Supreme Court justices and other federal judges are, effectively, appointed for life, with no built-in check on their cognitive functioning as they approach old age. There is about a century of research on aging and intelligence that shows the vulnerability of processing speed, fluid reasoning, visual-spatial processing, and working memory to…
Descriptors: Judges, Federal Government, Aging (Individuals), Decision Making
Cuskelly, Monica; Moni, Karen; Lloyd, Jan; Jobling, Anne – Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 2013
Background: The study reported here was an examination of the reliability of a method for determining acquiescent responding and the capacity to respond to items using a Likert scale response format by adults with an intellectual disability. Method: Reliability of the outcomes of these procedures was investigated using a test-retest design.…
Descriptors: Intellectual Disability, Likert Scales, Responses, Test Reliability
Follesdal, Hallvard; Hagtvet, Knut A. – Intelligence, 2009
The Mayer, Salovey, & Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) has been reported to provide reliable scores for the four-branch ability model of emotional intelligence [Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2002). "Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT). User's manual." Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health…
Descriptors: Emotional Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Adults, Error of Measurement
Andrews, Jac J. W. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2007
In this article, the author reviews the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS), an individually administered test of intelligence appropriate for ages 3 through 94 years with a conormed, supplemental measure of memory. The RIAS should be administered by examiners who have formal training in assessment. In this regard, the RIAS is a…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Test Reviews, Memory, Test Content

Mishra, Shitala P.; Brown, Kenneth H. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1983
Compared the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) and the WAIS-Revised in a sample of 88 adults. Indices of obtained correlation coefficients suggested a high degree of similarity between the two scales. Results also showed that WAIS IQs were significantly higher than corresponding IQs on the WAIS-R. (WAS)
Descriptors: Adults, Comparative Testing, Intelligence Tests, Scores

Cella, David F.; And Others – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1985
Examined relative efficacy of two short forms of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) with respect to accurate subtest profile scatter (N=50). Subtest scores of both split-half Satz-Mogel short form and criterion referenced Modified WAIS-R (WAIS-RM) short form were found to differ significantly from full-length WAIS-R subtest scores.…
Descriptors: Adults, Criterion Referenced Tests, Estimation (Mathematics), Intelligence Tests

Gutkin, Terry B.; And Others – Journal of School Psychology, 1984
Performed orthogonal and oblique factor analysis using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) standardization sample (N=1,880). Analysis of the variance components for each subtest at every age level revealed a substantial proportion of subtests at a wide range of age levels evidenced high or intermediate levels of specific…
Descriptors: Adults, Factor Analysis, Intelligence Tests, Performance Factors

Dodrill, Carl B. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1983
Compared the Wonderlic Personal Test and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale for a sample of 30 adults first tested in 1976. The two tests were similar in reliability of clinical classification, but the Wonderlic demonstrated fewer practice effects. Despite its ease of administration, Wonderlic intelligence estimates appear stable. (Author/JAC)
Descriptors: Adults, Clinical Psychology, Followup Studies, Intelligence Quotient

Ryan, Joseph J.; And Others – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982
An examination of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) subtests and intelligence quotients in a diagnostically heterogeneous sample of patients referred for psychological or neuropsychological evaluation found that reliabilities and standard errors of measurement approximated normative group reports. WAIS-R is a reliable…
Descriptors: Adults, Clinical Diagnosis, Disabilities, Error of Measurement
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1 | 2