Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Testing | 3 |
| Test Reliability | 3 |
| Timed Tests | 3 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Ability Identification | 1 |
| Adaptive Testing | 1 |
| Alternative Assessment | 1 |
| Aptitude Tests | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Drills (Practice) | 1 |
| Factor Structure | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Bhola, Dennison S. | 1 |
| Geffen, Gina | 1 |
| Hinton-Bayre, Anton | 1 |
| Kong, Xiaojing J. | 1 |
| McBride, James R. | 1 |
| Wise, Steven L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
| Counselors | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Differential Aptitude Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hinton-Bayre, Anton; Geffen, Gina – Psychological Assessment, 2005
The present study examined the comparability of 4 alternate forms of the Digit Symbol Substitution test and the Symbol Digit Modalities (written) test, including the original versions. Male contact-sport athletes (N=112) were assessed on 1 of the 4 forms of each test. Reasonable alternate form comparability was demonstrated through establishing…
Descriptors: Intervals, Test Format, Orthographic Symbols, Drills (Practice)
Kong, Xiaojing J.; Wise, Steven L.; Bhola, Dennison S. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2007
This study compared four methods for setting item response time thresholds to differentiate rapid-guessing behavior from solution behavior. Thresholds were either (a) common for all test items, (b) based on item surface features such as the amount of reading required, (c) based on visually inspecting response time frequency distributions, or (d)…
Descriptors: Test Items, Reaction Time, Timed Tests, Item Response Theory
McBride, James R. – 1986
An overview of the development of a computerized version of the Differential Aptitude Tests (DAT) is presented. It describes the previously existing printed version of the DAT, design of the computerized adaptive edition, calibration of the test items for use in the computerized version, and two field studies that compared the Adaptive and…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adaptive Testing, Aptitude Tests, Comparative Testing

Peer reviewed
Direct link
