Descriptor
Difficulty Level | 5 |
Test Reliability | 5 |
True Scores | 5 |
Test Items | 3 |
Criterion Referenced Tests | 2 |
Error of Measurement | 2 |
Item Analysis | 2 |
Item Sampling | 2 |
Mathematical Models | 2 |
Analysis of Variance | 1 |
Career Development | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Lu, K. H. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Statistical Analysis, Statistical Significance, Test Items
Divgi, D. R. – 1978
One aim of criterion-referenced testing is to classify an examinee without reference to a norm group; therefore, any statements about the dependability of such classification ought to be group-independent also. A population-independent index is proposed in terms of the probability of incorrect classification near the cutoff true score. The…
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores, Difficulty Level, Error of Measurement
Kriewall, Thomas E. – Illinois School Research, 1972
Author discusses and defines criterion tests in the context of classroom needs that have created much of the interest in the theory at this time. The primary source of interest is related to the growing implementation of individualized curricula. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Difficulty Level, Individualized Instruction, Item Analysis

Lord, Frederic M. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1977
Under given conditions, conventional testing and computer-generated repeatable testing (CGRT) are equally effective for estimating examinee ability; CGRT is more effective for estimating the mean ability level of a group and less effective for estimating ability differences among individuals. These conclusion are drawn from domain-referenced test…
Descriptors: Career Development, Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level, Group Norms

Huck, Schuyler W.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1981
Believing that examinee-by-item interaction should be conceptualized as true score variability rather than as a result of errors of measurement, Lu proposed a modification of Hoyt's analysis of variance reliability procedure. Via a computer simulation study, it is shown that Lu's approach does not separate interaction from error. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Computer Programs, Difficulty Level