Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Graduate Students | 3 |
| Test Construction | 3 |
| Test Reliability | 3 |
| Test Use | 3 |
| Academic Persistence | 1 |
| Attitude Measures | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Counselor Educators | 1 |
| Counselor Training | 1 |
| Distance Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Breaugh, James A. | 1 |
| Castano-Bishop, Marianne | 1 |
| Freeman, Brenda | 1 |
| Harris, Sandra M. | 1 |
| Lanning, Wayne | 1 |
| Larrier, Yvonne I. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkHarris, Sandra M.; Larrier, Yvonne I.; Castano-Bishop, Marianne – Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2011
The problem of attrition in online learning has drawn attention from distance education administrators and chief academic officers of higher education institutions. Many studies have addressed factors related to student attrition, persistence and retention in online courses. However, few studies have examined how student expectations influence…
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, Student Attitudes, Distance Education, Academic Persistence
Peer reviewedBreaugh, James A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1998
Results of 3 studies, involving 80 adult employees, 6,810 defense contractor employees, and 88 graduate students, support the reliability and validity of a new measure of global work autonomy, the Global Work Autonomy Scale (B. Ashforth and A. Saks, 1995). (SLD)
Descriptors: Employees, Graduate Students, Professional Autonomy, Test Construction
Peer reviewedLanning, Wayne; Freeman, Brenda – Counselor Education and Supervision, 1994
Discusses revision of Supervisor Emphasis Rating Form (SERF) into ipsative instrument and suggests future research that could profitably be done with new instrument. Explains rationale for choosing ipsative format and presents findings of study conducted to establish instrument reliability. SERF-Revised is appended. (Author/NB)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Counselor Educators, Graduate Students, Higher Education
