Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Creativity | 3 |
| Creativity Tests | 3 |
| Intelligence | 3 |
| Test Reliability | 3 |
| Creative Thinking | 2 |
| Achievement | 1 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Concept Formation | 1 |
| Creative Activities | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Backteman, G. | 1 |
| Benedek, Mathias | 1 |
| Burgstaller, Julia A. | 1 |
| Fürst, Guillaume | 1 |
| Grabner, Roland H. | 1 |
| Magnusson, D. | 1 |
| Meier, Michaela A. | 1 |
| Vogel, Stephan E. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Sweden | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Torrance Tests of Creative… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Meier, Michaela A.; Burgstaller, Julia A.; Benedek, Mathias; Vogel, Stephan E.; Grabner, Roland H. – Journal of Intelligence, 2021
Mathematical creativity is perceived as an increasingly important aspect of everyday life and, consequently, research has increased over the past decade. However, mathematical creativity has mainly been investigated in children and adolescents so far. Therefore, the first goal of the current study was to develop a mathematical creativity measure…
Descriptors: Adults, Mathematics, Creativity, Intelligence
Fürst, Guillaume – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2020
This paper introduces a method for the assessment of creativity that relies on creativity tasks, a subjective evaluation procedure, and a planned missing data design that offers a drastic reduction in the overall implementation costs (administration time and scoring procedure). This method was tested on a sample of 149 people, using three…
Descriptors: Creativity, Creativity Tests, Task Analysis, Creative Thinking
Peer reviewedMagnusson, D.; Backteman, G. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1979
A longitudinal study of approximately 1,000 students aged 10-16 showed high stability of intelligence and creativity. Stability coefficients for intelligence were higher than those for creativity. Results supported the construct validity of creativity. (MH)
Descriptors: Creativity, Creativity Tests, Elementary Secondary Education, Foreign Countries

Direct link
