NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 49 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McLeod, Justin W.H.; McCrimmon, Adam W. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2021
The "Raven's 2 Progressive Matrices Clinical Edition" (Raven's 2; Raven, Rust, Chan, & Zhou, 2018), published by NCS Pearson, is an individually administered nonverbal assessment of general cognitive ability developed to measure "educative abilities," defined as the ability to think clearly and solve complex problems in…
Descriptors: Test Reviews, Intelligence Tests, Testing, Test Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Colp, S. Mitchell; Nordstokke, David W. – Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 2014
Published by the Canadian Test Centre (CTC), "Insight" represents a group-administered test of cognitive functioning that has been built entirely upon the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theoretical framework. "Insight" is intended to be administered by educators and screen entire classrooms for students who present learning…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Learning Disabilities, Intelligence Tests, Profiles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chu, Yiting; Lai, Mark H. C.; Xu, Yining; Zhou, Yuanyuan – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2012
The authors review the "Advanced Clinical Solutions for WAIS-IV and WMS-IV". The "Advanced Clinical Solutions (ACS) for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition" (WAIS-IV; Wechsler, 2008) and the "Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition" (WMS-IV; Wechsler, 2009) was published by Pearson in 2009. It is a…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Memory, Cognitive Tests, Social Cognition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McCrimmon, Adam W.; Smith, Amanda D. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2013
The Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Second Edition (WASI-II; Wechsler, 2011), published by Pearson, is a newly updated abbreviated measure of cognitive intelligence designed for individuals 6 to 90 years of age. Primarily used in clinical, psychoeducational, and research settings, the WASI-II was developed to quickly and accurately…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Testing, Masters Degrees, Doctoral Degrees
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dombrowski, Stefan C.; Mrazik, Martin – Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 2008
In this article, the authors review the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS; Reynolds & Kamphaus, 2003), an individually administered test of intelligence for use with individuals between the ages of 3 and 94. The RIAS represents the newest intelligence test on the marketplace and incorporates the most current intelligence test theory…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Test Reviews, Screening Tests, Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Andrews, Jac J. W. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2007
In this article, the author reviews the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS), an individually administered test of intelligence appropriate for ages 3 through 94 years with a conormed, supplemental measure of memory. The RIAS should be administered by examiners who have formal training in assessment. In this regard, the RIAS is a…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Test Reviews, Memory, Test Content
Luszki, Margaret Barron; And Others – J Consult Clin Psychol, 1970
It was hypothesized that one could predict the reliability of the shortened WAIS on the basis of the Spearman Brown formula, and that in testing, as in other fields, you get what you pay for. Results confirmed these hypotheses; a short form is not an adequate substitute for the full WAIS. (Author)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Intelligence Tests, Research, Test Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kaufman, Alan S.; Flanagan, Dawn P.; Alfonso, Vincent C.; Mascolo, Jennifer T. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2006
Within the field of psychological assessment, the Wechsler scales continue to be the most widely used intelligence batteries. The concepts, methods, and procedures inherent in the design of the Wechsler scales have been so influential that they have guided most of the test development and research in the field for more than a half century. This…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Test Reviews, Testing, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rogers, Dan L. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1980
To assess the utility and reliability of Bender test recall in children, 304 children (ages 5 through 14) were individually administered the copy and recall phases using Koppitz's directions. The recall phase was judged to be of doubtful utility in assessing intellectual functioning in children. (Author/SJL)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Intelligence Tests, Recall (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Piotrowski, Richard J. – Psychology in the Schools, 1976
Changes in the full scale reliability of the WISC-R were computed at three age levels when each subtest was omitted by itself. The same procedure was followed with those subtests which independently had the smallest effect in lowering full scale reliability. Cautions were noted concerning the exclusion of subtests. (Author)
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Statistical Studies, Test Construction, Test Interpretation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pielstick, N. L.; Thorndike, Robert M. – Psychology in the Schools, 1976
Reanalysis of Wakefield and Carlson's data confirmed canonical correlations of .84 and .69, but analysis of redundancies revealed that only 34 percent of the total WISC subtest variance is redundant with the ITPA and 39 percent of the ITPA subtest variance is redundant with the WISC. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Intelligence Tests, Statistical Analysis, Test Reliability
Silverstein, A. B. – J Consult Clin Psychol, 1970
Data from the WAIS, WISC, and WPPSI Standardization samples were used to reappraise validity of all short forms of two, three, four, and five subtests. Results were compared with those given by McNemar's formula. The corrected formula gave lower values and selected "best short forms that differed from McNemar's formula. (Author)
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Research, Test Reliability, Test Results
Yule, W.; and others – Brit J Educ Psychol, 1969
Descriptors: Evaluation, Intelligence Tests, Standardized Tests, Test Interpretation
Brittain, Michael – Brit J Educ Psychol, 1969
Descriptors: Evaluation, Intelligence Tests, Standardized Tests, Test Interpretation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Elwood, David L.; Griffin, H. Richard – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1972
A system was designed and constructed capable of totally automating the administration of several psychological tests and treatment procedures. It is described here. (Author)
Descriptors: Automation, Individual Testing, Intelligence Tests, Psychological Testing
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4