Descriptor
| Cutting Scores | 2 |
| Minimum Competency Testing | 2 |
| Test Bias | 2 |
| Test Reliability | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Testing Programs | 2 |
| Criterion Referenced Tests | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Formative Evaluation | 1 |
| Hearings | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Herman, Joan L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
| Florida | 1 |
| Illinois | 1 |
| Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textNational Inst. of Education (ED), Washington, DC. – 1981
Barbara Jordan served as the hearing officer for three-day adversary evaluation hearings about the pros and cons of minimum competency testing (MCT). This report is the complete transcript of the second day of proceedings. The pro team, lead by James Popham, began by presenting representatives of four states (Florida, California, Texas, and…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Elementary Secondary Education, Hearings, Minimum Competency Testing
Herman, Joan L. – 1982
A formative evaluation minimum competency test model is examined. The model systematically uses assessment information to support and facilitate program improvement. In terms of the model, four inter-related qualities are essential for a sound testing program. The content validity perspective looks at how well the district has defined competency…
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores, Evaluation Criteria, Formative Evaluation
