Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Foreign Countries | 3 |
| Test Theory | 3 |
| Achievement Tests | 2 |
| Item Response Theory | 2 |
| Scores | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Baroroh, Kiromim | 1 |
| Heri Retnawati | 1 |
| Kana Hidayati | 1 |
| Kartianom Kartianom | 1 |
| Lestari, Barkah | 1 |
| Muhson, Ali | 1 |
| Retnawati, Heri | 1 |
| Supriyanto | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
| Secondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| Indonesia | 3 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Program for International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textKartianom Kartianom; Heri Retnawati; Kana Hidayati – Journal of Pedagogical Research, 2024
Conducting a fair test is important for educational research. Unfair assessments can lead to gender disparities in academic achievement, ultimately resulting in disparities in opportunities, wages, and career choice. Differential Item Function [DIF] analysis is presented to provide evidence of whether the test is truly fair, where it does not harm…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Test Bias, Item Response Theory, Test Theory
Muhson, Ali; Lestari, Barkah; Supriyanto; Baroroh, Kiromim – International Journal of Instruction, 2017
Item analysis has essential roles in the learning assessment. The item analysis program is designed to measure student achievement and instructional effectiveness. This study was aimed to develop item-analysis program and verify its feasibility. This study uses a Research and Development (R & D) model. The procedure includes designing and…
Descriptors: Item Analysis, Questionnaires, Interviews, Test Items
Retnawati, Heri – Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 2015
This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the test scores as results of Test of English Proficiency (TOEP) based on paper and pencil test (PPT) versus computer-based test (CBT). Using the participants' responses to the PPT documented from 2008-2010 and data of CBT TOEP documented in 2013-2014 on the sets of 1A, 2A, and 3A for the Listening and…
Descriptors: Scores, Accuracy, Computer Assisted Testing, English (Second Language)
