NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shoji, Yoshihiko; Munejiri, Shuji; Kaga, Eiko – Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2021
In this study, we evaluate the validity of question 29 (Q.29) in the Force Concept Inventory (FCI), which requires an understanding of atmospheric pressure. At least in some Japanese physics classes, the rate of the correct answer to Q.29 is reduced between the pretest and post-test. To examine this deterioration of a student's response, we…
Descriptors: Science Tests, Physics, Test Validity, Pretests Posttests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Eaton, Philip; Frank, Barrett; Willoughby, Shannon – Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2020
Items that are chained, or blocked, together appear on many of the conceptual assessments utilized for physics education research. However, when items are chained together there is the potential to introduce local dependence between those items, which would violate the assumption of item independence required by classical test theory,…
Descriptors: Science Instruction, Physics, Motion, Scientific Concepts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yasuda, Jun-ichiro; Hull, Michael M.; Mae, Naohiro – Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2022
This paper presents improvements made to a computerized adaptive testing (CAT)-based version of the FCI (FCI-CAT) in regards to test security and test efficiency. First, we will discuss measures to enhance test security by controlling for item overexposure, decreasing the risk that respondents may (i) memorize the content of a pretest for use on…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Items, Risk Management