Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Generalizability Theory | 1 |
| Graduate Students | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 1 |
| Interrater Reliability | 1 |
| Judges | 1 |
| Scores | 1 |
| Scoring | 1 |
| Test Items | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textBennett, Randy Elliot; Rock, Donald A. – 1993
Formulating-Hypotheses (F-H) items present a situation and ask the examinee to generate as many explanations for it as possible. This study examined the generalizability, validity, and examinee perceptions of a computer-delivered version of the task. Eight F-H questions were administered to 192 graduate students. Half of the items restricted…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level, Generalizability Theory, Graduate Students
