NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Papenberg, Martin; Diedenhofen, Birk; Musch, Jochen – Journal of Experimental Education, 2021
Testwiseness may introduce construct-irrelevant variance to multiple-choice test scores. Presenting response options sequentially has been proposed as a potential solution to this problem. In an experimental validation, we determined the psychometric properties of a test based on the sequential presentation of response options. We created a strong…
Descriptors: Test Wiseness, Test Validity, Test Reliability, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Arce-Ferrer, Alvaro J.; Bulut, Okan – Journal of Experimental Education, 2019
This study investigated the performance of four widely used data-collection designs in detecting test-mode effects (i.e., computer-based versus paper-based testing). The experimental conditions included four data-collection designs, two test-administration modes, and the availability of an anchor assessment. The test-level and item-level results…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Test Construction, Test Format, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Weiten, Wayne – Journal of Experimental Education, 1982
A comparison of double as opposed to single multiple-choice questions yielded significant differences in regard to item difficulty, item discrimination, and internal reliability, but not concurrent validity. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Educational Testing, Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Green, Kathy – Journal of Experimental Education, 1979
Reliabilities and concurrent validities of teacher-made multiple-choice and true-false tests were compared. No significant differences were found even when multiple-choice reliability was adjusted to equate testing time. (Author/MH)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests, Test Format