NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Learning Disability Quarterly24
Location
Israel1
Texas1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Individuals with Disabilities…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 24 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Burns, Matthew K.; VanDerHeyden, Amanda M.; Duesenberg-Marshall, McKinzie D.; Romero, Monica E.; Stevens, Mallory A.; Izumi, Jared T.; McCollom, Elizabeth M. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2023
Students with dyslexia demonstrate reading difficulty in early literacy skills (e.g., phonemic awareness, word recognition, decoding), and administering screeners is a necessary step to implement effective intervention. There are several commonly used reading screeners, but the decision accuracy and predictive value between them varies. In the…
Descriptors: Dyslexia, Screening Tests, At Risk Students, Reading Difficulties
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Daley, Samantha G.; Rappolt-Schlichtmann, Gabrielle – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2018
Being identified with a learning disability makes students vulnerable to experiences of stigmatization, which can be associated with negative academic and emotional effects. Yet, research with other vulnerable populations demonstrates that individual perceptions of stigmatization, or stigma consciousness, are not uniform and that variability in…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Social Bias, Social Attitudes, Self Concept
Fletcher, Jack M.; Francis, David J.; Foorman, Barbara R.; Schatschneider, Christopher – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2021
Many states now mandate early screening for dyslexia, but vary in how they address these mandates. There is confusion about the nature of screening versus diagnostic assessments, risk versus diagnosis, concurrent versus predictive validity, and inattention to indices of classification accuracy as the basis for determining risk. To help define what…
Descriptors: Dyslexia, Disability Identification, Screening Tests, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mercer, Sterett H.; Keller-Margulis, Milena A.; Faith, Erin L.; Reid, Erin K.; Ochs, Sarah – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2019
Written-expression curriculum-based measurement (WE-CBM) is used for screening and progress monitoring students with or at risk of learning disabilities (LD) for academic supports; however, WE-CBM has limitations in technical adequacy, construct representation, and scoring feasibility as grade-level increases. The purpose of this study was to…
Descriptors: Grade 2, Grade 3, Grade 4, Grade 5
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McGill, Ryan J.; Styck, Kara M.; Palomares, Ronald S.; Hass, Michael R. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2016
As a result of the upcoming Federal reauthorization of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA), practitioners and researchers have begun vigorously debating what constitutes evidence-based assessment for the identification of specific learning disability (SLD). This debate has resulted in strong support for a method that…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Disability Identification, Disabilities, Federal Legislation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lufi, Dubi; Awwad, Abeer – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2013
The purpose of this article was to describe an initial step developing a new scale to identify individuals with learning disabilities (LD) and test anxiety. Eighty-eight students answered the "Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2" (MMPI-2). The participants were drawn from the following three groups: (a) adults with LD and test…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Test Anxiety, Comparative Analysis, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Parmar, Rene S.; And Others – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1996
This study used the Assessment Standards of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics to evaluate the appropriateness and adequacy of selected standardized tests of mathematics achievement as they pertain to students with disabilities. Problems with content validity included inadequate representation of content domains, inappropriate…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Content Validity, Elementary Secondary Education, Mathematics Achievement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kavale, Kenneth A.; Forness, Steven R. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1984
Meta-analysis was used to arrive at a quantitative synthesis of the results of 94 studies of the validity of Wechsler regroupings for differential diagnosis of learning disabilities. The primary findings indicated that no recategorization, profile, factor cluster, or pattern showed a significant difference between learning disabled and normal…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Disability Identification, Learning Disabilities, Profiles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ysseldyke, James E.; And Others – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1981
The validity of the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery was evaluated with a sample of 50 learning disabled fourth graders. In general, the Battery has some convergent validity but little discriminant validity relative to various cluster scores or specific uses. (Author)
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Intermediate Grades, Learning Disabilities, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Slate, John R.; And Others – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1990
Scores of 38 learning-disabled college students on the revised Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-R) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) were compared. Results indicated significant correlations between the tests, though subjects tended to obtain higher scores on the WISC-R than on the WAIS-R. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: College Students, Higher Education, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lewis, Richard D.; Lorion, Raymond P. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1988
Evaluation of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery's utility in distinguishing between 30 male adolescents diagnosed as learning disabled (LD) and 30 matched non-LD students indicated that the battery correctly classified 90 percent of the sample with 6.7 percent false positives and 13.3 percent false negatives. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Educational Diagnosis, Handicap Identification, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reeve, Ronald E.; And Others – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1979
The study compared the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery Tests of Cognitive Ability and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--Revised for a sample of 51 learning disabled children (7-11 years old). (Author/SBH)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Exceptional Child Research, Intelligence Tests, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Oakland, Thomas; Dowling, Lucy – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1983
Results of a study on 188 elementary age children from three racial ethnic and two socioeconomic groups found that Draw A Person (DAP) Test scores correlated significantly and consistently with five of the six major achievement areas supporting the use of the DAP with children of diverse backgrounds. (DB)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Elementary Education, Ethnic Groups, Minority Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Beech, Martha C. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1981
Findings were interpreted to mean that the BTBC can be used as a general estimate of cognitive ability. Canonical analysis of all variables revealed the presence of one common factor, language comprehension (Author)
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Concept Formation, Exceptional Child Research, Kindergarten
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McGue, Matt; And Others – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1982
The usefulness of the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery (W-J) to assess learning disabled (LD) children was assessed. The W-J factor clusters could not be replicated with this LD sample, and little evidence was found of the validity of either the cognitive factor clusters or the aptitude factor clusters. (Author/SEW)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Cognitive Tests, Factor Structure, Interest Inventories
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2