Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Computer Assisted Testing | 6 |
Test Validity | 6 |
Test Reliability | 3 |
Undergraduate Students | 3 |
Clinical Diagnosis | 2 |
Scores | 2 |
Test Use | 2 |
Ability | 1 |
Adaptive Testing | 1 |
Adults | 1 |
Alcohol Abuse | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Psychological Assessment | 6 |
Author
Ben-Porath, Yossef S. | 1 |
Carey, Kate B. | 1 |
Clark, Lee Anna | 1 |
DeMartini, Kelly S. | 1 |
Forbey, Johnathan D. | 1 |
Garb, Howard N. | 1 |
Grant, Carolyn D. | 1 |
Kobak, Kenneth A. | 1 |
Nash, Michael R. | 1 |
Simms, Leonard J. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Minnesota | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Minnesota Multiphasic… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
DeMartini, Kelly S.; Carey, Kate B. – Psychological Assessment, 2012
The screening and brief intervention modality of treatment for at-risk college drinking is becoming increasingly popular. A key to effective implementation is use of validated screening tools. Although the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) has been validated in adult samples and is often used with college students, research has not…
Descriptors: Identification, Alcohol Abuse, College Students, Gender Differences
Forbey, Johnathan D.; Ben-Porath, Yossef S. – Psychological Assessment, 2007
Computerized adaptive testing in personality assessment can improve efficiency by significantly reducing the number of items administered to answer an assessment question. Two approaches have been explored for adaptive testing in computerized personality assessment: item response theory and the countdown method. In this article, the authors…
Descriptors: Personality Traits, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Validity, Personality Assessment
Garb, Howard N. – Psychological Assessment, 2007
To evaluate the value of computer-administered interviews and rating scales, the following topics are reviewed in the present article: (a) strengths and weaknesses of structured and unstructured assessment instruments, (b) advantages and disadvantages of computer administration, and (c) the validity and utility of computer-administered interviews…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Rating Scales, Interviews, Evaluation Methods
Simms, Leonard J.; Clark, Lee Anna – Psychological Assessment, 2005
This is a validation study of a computerized adaptive (CAT) version of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP) conducted with 413 undergraduates who completed the SNAP twice, 1 week apart. Participants were assigned randomly to 1 of 4 retest groups: (a) paper-and-pencil (P&P) SNAP, (b) CAT, (c) P&P/CAT, and (d) CAT/P&P. With…
Descriptors: Personality Measures, Personality, Test Validity, Computer Assisted Testing

Kobak, Kenneth A.; And Others – Psychological Assessment, 1993
A developed computer-administered form of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale and the clinician form of the instrument were administered to 214 psychiatric outpatients and 78 community adults. Results support the reliability and validity of the computer-administered version as an alternative to the clinician-administered version. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adults, Anxiety, Clinical Diagnosis, Comparative Testing

Grant, Carolyn D.; Nash, Michael R. – Psychological Assessment, 1995
In a counterbalanced, within subjects, repeated measures design, 130 undergraduates were administered the Computer-Assisted Hypnosis Scale (CAHS) and the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale and were hypnotized. The CAHS was shown to be a psychometrically sound instrument for measuring hypnotic ability. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Clinical Diagnosis, Computer Assisted Testing, Diagnostic Tests