Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 3 |
| Adaptive Testing | 3 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 3 |
| Measurement | 3 |
| Test Validity | 3 |
| Scores | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Diagnostic Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Benjamin G. Solomon | 1 |
| Hull, Michael M. | 1 |
| Kayla V. Campaña | 1 |
| Lane, Suzanne | 1 |
| Leventhal, Brian | 1 |
| Mae, Naohiro | 1 |
| Yasuda, Jun-ichiro | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
| Race to the Top | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Force Concept Inventory | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkYasuda, Jun-ichiro; Hull, Michael M.; Mae, Naohiro – Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2022
This paper presents improvements made to a computerized adaptive testing (CAT)-based version of the FCI (FCI-CAT) in regards to test security and test efficiency. First, we will discuss measures to enhance test security by controlling for item overexposure, decreasing the risk that respondents may (i) memorize the content of a pretest for use on…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Items, Risk Management
Kayla V. Campaña; Benjamin G. Solomon – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2025
The purpose of this study was to compare the classification accuracy of data produced by the previous year's end-of-year New York state assessment, a computer-adaptive diagnostic assessment ("i-Ready"), and the gating combination of both assessments to predict the rate of students passing the following year's end-of-year state assessment…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Classification, Diagnostic Tests, Adaptive Testing
Lane, Suzanne; Leventhal, Brian – Review of Research in Education, 2015
This chapter addresses the psychometric challenges in assessing English language learners (ELLs) and students with disabilities (SWDs). The first section addresses some general considerations in the assessment of ELLs and SWDs, including the prevalence of ELLs and SWDs in the student population, federal and state legislation that requires the…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Evaluation Problems, English Language Learners, Disabilities
