NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 20 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reynolds, Cecil R. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1980
In support of the construct validity of the revised scale, a high correlation was observed between the revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (CMAS) and the trait anxiety inventory, whereas there was no significant correlation with the state anxiety inventory. (Author)
Descriptors: Anxiety, Children, Clinical Psychology, Comparative Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kaufman, Alan S.; McLean, James E. – Journal of School Psychology, 1987
Investigated factor structures of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) and Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) for 212 normal children. Findings suggest correspondence between: (1) WISC-R Verbal Comprehension and K-ABC Achievement; (2) WISC-R Perceptual Organization and K-ABC Simultaneous Processing; and (3) WISC-R…
Descriptors: Children, Comparative Testing, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ferrari, Michael – Psychology in the Schools, 1980
The Peabody correlated significantly with the McCarthy General Cognitive Index, Verbal Scale, Perceptual Scale, and Memory Scale. A significant difference between the means of the two tests was found, with the Peabody yielding lower scores. (Author)
Descriptors: Autism, Children, Cognitive Measurement, Comparative Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Naglieri, Jack A.; Pfeiffer, Steven I. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1983
Explored the relationship between the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (PPVT-R) and the Peabody Individual Achievement Test (PIAT) administered to a sample of 29 mentally retarded children. Findings indicated that the PPVT-R predicted achievement as measured by the PIAT only moderately; and that PPVT-R scores correlated with achievement…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Children, Comparative Testing, Mental Retardation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Singer, Marc G.; And Others – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1983
Investigated the concurrent validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (Revised) subtests and three IQs compared to Wide Range Achievement Test standard scores, in 28 learning-disabled children. Analysis showed no significant correlations between WISC-R and WRAT scores, indicating a lack of concurrent validity on the WAIS-R. (WAS)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Children, Comparative Testing, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cummings, Jack A.; Sanville, David – Psychology in the Schools, 1983
Administered the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) and the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability (WJTCA) to educable mentally retarded children (N=30). Results showed significant mean differences between WISC-R and WJTCA full-scale standard scores, providing implications for placement of children in classes for the…
Descriptors: Children, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Measurement, Comparative Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ritter, David R. – Psychology in the Schools, 1976
The Arthur Adaptation of the Leiter International Performance Scale, Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices, and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Performance Section were administered to 31 children with mild to moderate hearing impairments. A comparison of test results indicated moderate convergent validity among the measures. (Author)
Descriptors: Children, Cognitive Ability, Comparative Analysis, Comparative Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ridley, Stanley E.; Bayton, James A. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1983
Examined and compared the validity of Friedman's Developmental Level (DL) and Exner's Developmental Quality (DQ) as measures of cognitive development in children (N=134). Results supported the convergent and discriminant validity of both DL and DQ. The DL and DQ were most strongly related to different types of cognitive ability. (JAC)
Descriptors: Children, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wrobel, Nancy Howells; Lachar, David – Psychology in the Schools, 1998
Examines the comparative validity of a parent-report scale and a self-report scale, both designed to assess behavioral and emotional problems. Results, based on 111 children in regular education classrooms, indicate that parent reports were more sensitive to overt behavioral problems, whereas self-reports were sensitive to mood disturbances and…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Children, Comparative Testing, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Clark, Priscilla; And Others – Journal of School Psychology, 1987
Investigated use of revised Slosson Intelligence Test (SIT) for screening public school students (N=131) for giftedness. Found revised SIT intelligence quotient (IQ) mean to be significantly lower than old ratio SIT IQ mean, significantly higher than Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised and Stanford-Binet means. Advises caution in…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Adolescents, Children, Comparative Testing
Turner, Carol J.; Smith, Jeffrey K. – Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1982
Used aggregate ratings of teacher behavior as data for a multitrait-multimethod validity analysis. Scaled ratings using Rasch latent trait scaling model and traditional scaling techniques. Compared Rasch-scaled multitrait-multimethod matrix to the traditionally scaled multitrait-multimethod matrix. Results showed Rasch scaling resulted in higher…
Descriptors: Children, Comparative Testing, Data Analysis, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pedriana, Anthony J.; Bracken, Bruce A. – Psychology in the Schools, 1982
Compared the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (PPVT-R) for 31 gifted children. The sample mean for the PPVT-R was significantly lower than for the PPVT. Additionally, the PPVT and PPVT-R correlated to a significant degree, yielding a standard score correlation coefficient of .83. (Author)
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Children, Cohort Analysis, Comparative Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Goh, David S.; Simons, Marc R. – Psychology in the Schools, 1980
Learning disabled children performed lower than general education children on all five major scale indexes. A similar amount of scatter was present in the profiles of learning disabled and general education children. No specific pattern of scale indexes could be determined as typical for learning disabled children. (Author)
Descriptors: Children, Comparative Testing, Diagnostic Tests, Educational Diagnosis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gutkin, Terry B. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1982
Results indicated that despite very high correlations between deviation quotients and traditional measures, changes of potential diagnostic significance occurred in scores of over half the sample (N=2,200). Discusses the potential utility of the factorially pure deviation quotients. Presents a table for translation of scaled scores into these…
Descriptors: Children, Comparative Testing, Diagnostic Tests, Educational Diagnosis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hoffman, Jeffrey D.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1996
Compares the predictive and concurrent validities of a learning efficiency test with that of another test. Memory factor scores of the learning efficiency test correlated significantly with the other test's scores, with class grades, and with actual grade-level functioning in reading. The learning efficiency test's validity compares favorably to…
Descriptors: Children, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Elementary Education
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2