Descriptor
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Measurement Techniques | 1 |
| School Counselors | 1 |
| Scoring | 1 |
| Student Evaluation | 1 |
| Test Items | 1 |
| Test Validity | 1 |
| Weighted Scores | 1 |
Source
| Measurement & Evaluation in… | 1 |
Author
| Feldt, Leonard S. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedFeldt, Leonard S. – Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development, 2004
In some settings, the validity of a battery composite or a test score is enhanced by weighting some parts or items more heavily than others in the total score. This article describes methods of estimating the total score reliability coefficient when differential weights are used with items or parts.
Descriptors: Test Items, Scoring, Cognitive Processes, Test Validity
