Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 3 |
| Interest Inventories | 3 |
| Test Validity | 3 |
| College Students | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Test Format | 2 |
| Adult Literacy | 1 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Educationally Disadvantaged | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Hansen, Jo-Ida C. | 1 |
| Haverkamp, Beth E. | 1 |
| Kimball, James C. | 1 |
| Lubinski, Barbara R. | 1 |
| Neuman, Jody L. | 1 |
| Vansickle, Timothy R. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Strong Campbell Interest… | 1 |
| Strong Interest Inventory | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedVansickle, Timothy R.; And Others – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1989
Examined the equivalence of two versions of the Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory (SCII) using four combinations of paper-and-pencil and computer administrations with college student subjects (N=75). Found slightly better test-retest reliability for the computer-based SCII. (Author/ABL)
Descriptors: College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education, Interest Inventories
Peer reviewedHansen, Jo-Ida C.; Neuman, Jody L.; Haverkamp, Beth E.; Lubinski, Barbara R. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1997
Examined user reaction to computer-administered and paper-and-pencil-administered forms of the Strong Interest Inventory. Results indicate that user reactions to the two administration modes were reasonably similar in most areas. However, the computer group indicated more often that their version was easier to use and follow. (RJM)
Descriptors: College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education, Interest Inventories
Peer reviewedKimball, James C. – Journal of Employment Counseling, 1988
Developed paper-and-pencil and microcomputer versions of prototype occupational interest inventory for academically disadvantaged or functionally illiterate adults. Compared results obtained from 30 such adults on the United States Employment Service Interest Inventory and both versions of the prototype inventory. Results revealed acceptable…
Descriptors: Adult Literacy, Adults, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
