Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
| Garrett, Kimberly K. | 1 |
| Kim, Hae-Jin | 1 |
| Moran, Michael J. | 1 |
| Powers, Donald E. | 1 |
| VanWinkle, Waverely | 1 |
| Weng, Vincent Z. | 1 |
| Xi, Xiaoming | 1 |
| Yu, Feng | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| California | 1 |
| Florida | 1 |
| Japan | 1 |
| North Carolina | 1 |
| South Korea | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
| Test of English for… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textPowers, Donald E.; Kim, Hae-Jin; Yu, Feng; Weng, Vincent Z.; VanWinkle, Waverely – Educational Testing Service, 2009
To facilitate the interpretation of test scores from the new TOEIC[R] (Test of English for International Communications[TM]) speaking and writing tests as measures of English-language proficiency, we administered a self-assessment inventory to TOEIC examinees in Japan and Korea, to gather their perceptions of their ability to perform a variety of…
Descriptors: English for Special Purposes, Language Tests, Writing Tests, Speech Tests
Direct linkXi, Xiaoming – Language Assessment Quarterly, 2007
Although the primary use of the speaking section of the Test of English as a Foreign Language Internet-based test (TOEFL[R] iBT Speaking) is to inform admissions decisions at English medium universities, it may also be useful as an initial screening measure for international teaching assistants (ITAs). This study provides criterion-related…
Descriptors: Test Validity, Speech Tests, Language Tests, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewedGarrett, Kimberly K.; Moran, Michael J. – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 1992
The severity of phonological involvement of 20 phonologically impaired children (ages 5-9) was compared using 5 measures: phonological deviance scores, percent consonants correct based on either connected speech or single words, and perceptual ratings from elementary education majors and graduate students in speech-language pathology. All five…
Descriptors: Articulation Impairments, Correlation, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods
