Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 9 |
Descriptor
Disabilities | 51 |
Screening Tests | 51 |
Test Validity | 51 |
Test Reliability | 35 |
Disability Identification | 21 |
Child Development | 16 |
Standardized Tests | 14 |
Young Children | 14 |
Test Content | 13 |
Preschool Education | 12 |
Test Format | 12 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Early Childhood Education | 5 |
Preschool Education | 3 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Kindergarten | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 8 |
Practitioners | 5 |
Administrators | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Individuals with Disabilities… | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Cunha, Ana C. B.; Berkovits, Michelle D.; Albuquerque, Karolina A. – Infants and Young Children, 2018
Developmental assessment scales are important tools for determining developmental delays and planning preventive interventions. One broad assessment scale used to evaluate child development is the Battelle Developmental Inventories (BDIs). The BDI-2 has a standardized version in English with good psychometric properties and a translated version in…
Descriptors: Child Development, Measures (Individuals), Young Children, Literature Reviews
Lombardi, Allison; Gelbar, Nicholas; Dukes, Lyman L., III; Kowitt, Jennifer; Wei, Yan; Madaus, Joseph; Lalor, Adam R.; Faggella-Luby, Michael – Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 2018
In this study, the literature in disability and higher education was examined, with a specific focus on assessment instruments. Published articles (n = 203) on development of new or refinement of existing instruments were reviewed for traits measured and psychometric rigor reported. Findings showed instruments are intended for professionals and…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Disabilities, College Environment, Campuses
Coughlan, Kelly A. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2015
The "Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Learning, Fourth Edition" (DIAL-4), is an individually administered screening test of skills and associated rating forms designed to identify children ages 2 years 6 months to 5 years 11 months who may be in need of diagnostic assessment or intervention across five developmental…
Descriptors: Screening Tests, Kindergarten, At Risk Students, Academic Failure
Lappalainen, Kristiina; Savolainen, Hannu; Sointu, Erkko T.; Epstein, Michael H. – International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 2014
This study investigated the cross-informant agreement among student self-report, teacher report, and parent report on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire translated into Finnish (SDQ-Fin) and estimated mean convergent and divergent correlations with a sample of fifth-grade Finnish students (N = 588) and the cross-informant agreement among…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Questionnaires, Finno Ugric Languages, Grade 5
Halle, Tamara; Zaslow, Martha; Wessel, Julia; Moodie, Shannon; Darling-Churchill, Kristen – Administration for Children & Families, 2011
The 2007 reauthorization of Head Start requires Head Start programs to use child assessments and developmental screeners that are developmentally, linguistically, and culturally appropriate, as well as valid and reliable in the language in which they are used. This can be a challenge, since very few child assessment tools are developed or tested…
Descriptors: Preschool Education, Disadvantaged Youth, Preschool Children, Disabilities
Bagnato, Stephen J.; Macy, Marisa – NHSA Dialog, 2010
Authentic assessment is a growing alternative to conventional testing. This research-to-practice article describes a framework for implementing authentic assessment. The R-E-A-L framework shows how roles, equipment, assessment tools, and location can be incorporated into early childhood practices.
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Performance Based Assessment, Program Implementation, Guidelines
Erford, Bradley T.; Balcom, Lindsey C.; Moore-Thomas, Cheryl – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2007
This study provides preliminary analysis of reliability and validity of scores on the Screening Test for Emotional Problems, which was designed to identify students ages 5 to 18 years who are referred for wide-ranging emotional disturbances categorized under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act (U.S. Department of Education,…
Descriptors: Emotional Problems, Disabilities, Test Validity, Screening Tests

Ribner, Sol; And Others – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 1983
Scores of elementary school students referred for special education on the Clinical Evaluation of Language Functions (CELF) were compared to rating of language specialists. CELF tests did not consistently identify children requiring therapeutic help nor those with language deficits. CELF scores also exhibited considerable variability. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Elementary Education, Screening Tests, Speech Tests
Macy, Marisa; Bagnato, Stephen J. – NHSA Dialog, 2010
The inclusion of young children with disabilities has remained a function of the Head Start program since its inception in the 1960s when the United States Congress mandated that children with disabilities comprise 10% of the Head Start enrollment (Zigler & Styfco, 2000). Standardized, norm-referenced tests used to identify children with…
Descriptors: Performance Based Assessment, Disadvantaged Youth, Norm Referenced Tests, Disabilities
Lichtenstein, Robert – 1982
The paper describes development of the Minneapolis Preschool Screening Instrument (MPSI), a measure for identifying children needing preschool intervention. The measure was designed to be brief to administer, inexpensive and simple enough so that both professionals and nonprofessionals could quickly learn administration and scoring. A…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Preschool Education, Screening Tests, Test Construction

Miller, Lucy Jane; Sprong, Tracy A. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1986
Ten psychometric criteria (such as item analysis, concurrent validity, and interexaminer reliability) were used to compare four preschool screening tests: "Comprehensive Identification Process", "Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Learning--Revised" (Dial--R), "Denver Developmental Screening Test", and…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Item Analysis, Preschool Education, Screening Tests

Mardell-Czudnowski, Carol D. – Journal for Special Educators, 1980
The article describes the preschool screening test, "Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Learning" (DIAL), and reviews research findings on the test from 1973 through 1978. It is concluded that the DIAL is maintaining relatively high levels of criterion-related validity (both concurrent and predictive) when compared to other…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Predictive Validity, Preschool Education, Preschool Tests
McLean, Mary; And Others – Diagnostique, 1987
The study compared the results of the Battelle Developmental Inventory (BDI) Screening Test with the Denver Developmental Screening Test-Revised and with the full-scale BDI for 30 handicapped and 35 nonhandicapped children, all aged six months to six years. Major differences were found between the tests and populations identified for follow-up.…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Handicap Identification, Infants, Preschool Education

Bricker, Diane; Squires, Jane – Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1989
The evaluation of a parent-completed screening system, the Infant Monitoring Questionnaires, found: 86 percent to 91 percent agreement between classifications of infants made using standardized tests and the questionnaires, low under-screening and over-screening rates (0 percent to 11 percent), high inter-observer and test-retest agreement, and…
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Disabilities, Handicap Identification, Infants
Robinson, Cordelia C.; And Others – Diagnostique, 1986
The use of multidomain instruments for screening or diagnostic purposes with handicapped infants and preschoolers is reviewed. Purposes of assessment and criteria for instrument utility are presented. Five multidomain screening tools and three multidomain diagnostic instruments are reviewed with respect to their validity, reliability, and utility.…
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Disabilities, Handicap Identification, Infants