Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Error of Measurement | 3 |
Evaluation Research | 3 |
Test Reliability | 3 |
Test Validity | 3 |
Misconceptions | 2 |
Academic Standards | 1 |
Achievement Rating | 1 |
Change Strategies | 1 |
Cutting Scores | 1 |
Educational Assessment | 1 |
Equivalency Tests | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Dwyer, Andrew C. | 1 |
Gardner, John | 1 |
Gomez Grajales, Carlos Alberto | 1 |
Kurkiewicz, Dason | 1 |
Williams, Matt N. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Dwyer, Andrew C. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2016
This study examines the effectiveness of three approaches for maintaining equivalent performance standards across test forms with small samples: (1) common-item equating, (2) resetting the standard, and (3) rescaling the standard. Rescaling the standard (i.e., applying common-item equating methodology to standard setting ratings to account for…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Equivalency Tests, Test Format, Academic Standards
Williams, Matt N.; Gomez Grajales, Carlos Alberto; Kurkiewicz, Dason – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2013
In 2002, an article entitled "Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test" by Osborne and Waters was published in "PARE." This article has gone on to be viewed more than 275,000 times (as of August 2013), and it is one of the first results displayed in a Google search for "regression…
Descriptors: Multiple Regression Analysis, Misconceptions, Reader Response, Predictor Variables
Gardner, John – Oxford Review of Education, 2013
Evidence from recent research suggests that in the UK the public perception of errors in national examinations is that they are simply mistakes; events that are preventable. This perception predominates over the more sophisticated technical view that errors arise from many sources and create an inevitable variability in assessment outcomes. The…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Public Opinion, Error of Measurement, Foreign Countries