Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Individual Testing | 65 |
| Test Validity | 65 |
| Test Reliability | 31 |
| Test Construction | 19 |
| Intelligence Tests | 17 |
| Achievement Tests | 16 |
| Group Testing | 14 |
| Test Reviews | 9 |
| Testing | 9 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 8 |
| Standardized Tests | 8 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 4 |
| Practitioners | 2 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
| California | 1 |
| Denmark | 1 |
| Jordan | 1 |
| New York | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
| Larry P v Riles | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Camilli, Gregory – Educational Research and Evaluation, 2013
In the attempt to identify or prevent unfair tests, both quantitative analyses and logical evaluation are often used. For the most part, fairness evaluation is a pragmatic attempt at determining whether procedural or substantive due process has been accorded to either a group of test takers or an individual. In both the individual and comparative…
Descriptors: Alternative Assessment, Test Bias, Test Content, Test Format
Green, Anthony; Unaldi, Aylin; Weir, Cyril – Language Testing, 2010
Providers of tests of languages for academic purposes generally claim to provide evidence on the extent to which students are likely to be able to cope with the future demands of reading in specified real-life contexts. Such claims need to be supported by evidence that the texts employed in the test reflect salient features of the texts the test…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Individual Characteristics, Individual Testing, Test Validity
Peer reviewedAyers, Jerry B.; Johnson, Charles E. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1970
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Individual Testing, Kindergarten, Predictive Validity
Peer reviewedSwanson, Beverly B.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1981
Samples of entering first-grade students were used to examine the predictive validity of the group administered Metropolitan Readiness Test (MRT) and the individually administered Meeting Street School Screening Test (MSSST). The advantage of the latter was found to possibly outweigh the advantage of efficiency in group administration. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Grade 1, Group Testing, Individual Testing, Predictive Validity
Kresh, Esther; Green, Bert F., Jr. – 1969
The Preschool Academic Skills Test was developed from an analysis of first-grade reading and mathematics materials to identify those behaviors that were assumed to be in students' repertoires prior to first grade. The 105 items are grouped in 10 subtests: Vocabulary, Color Naming, Classification, Functional Relationships, Visual Matching, Auditory…
Descriptors: Disadvantaged Youth, Individual Testing, Kindergarten Children, Middle Class
Peer reviewedArmstrong, Robert J.; And Others – Child Study Journal, 1971
Descriptors: Individual Testing, Intelligence Tests, Placement, Special Classes
Humphreys, Lloyd G.; And Others – 1970
This collection of papers, concerned with the nature and theory of intelligence, forms part of a project to integrate test and factor theory with the empirical, functional relationships involving standard intelligence tests. The project will render more objective the use of factor analysis in personnel research. A definition of intelligence…
Descriptors: Ability, Correlation, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure
Peer reviewedCurtis, Connie June; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1979
The score distributions of the two methods of administration described in the title revealed comparable means, standard deviations, and general shape of distribution. With respect to validity coefficients, no appreciable differences were found. (JKS)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Educational Testing, Eye Hand Coordination, Grade 2
Peer reviewedElwood, David L.; Griffin, H. Richard – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1972
A system was designed and constructed capable of totally automating the administration of several psychological tests and treatment procedures. It is described here. (Author)
Descriptors: Automation, Individual Testing, Intelligence Tests, Psychological Testing
Peer reviewedChew, Alex L.; Morris, John D. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1984
The validity of the Lollipop Test: A Diagnostic Screening Test of School Readiness was examined using the Metropolitan Readiness Test (MRT), Level I, Form Q, as the criterion. Appreciable concurrent validity was found across test batteries. Implications for school readiness screening are discussed. (Author/BS)
Descriptors: Correlation, Individual Testing, Kindergarten Children, Multivariate Analysis
Peer reviewedBenson, Bernard W.; Young, Linda L. – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1971
Describes validation procedures used with an individually administered test involving a branching program format to assess students level of cognitive achievement in biology. Reports results of comparisons of classes of teachers with BSCS or non-BSCS backgrounds. (AL)
Descriptors: Biology, Cognitive Measurement, Individual Testing, Secondary School Science
Miklich, Donald R. – Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1971
This article describes a device used to array the pieces of the Object Assembly Test, a subscale of the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children, in exact standardized order in less time than is now needed and without a screen, thus guaranteeing that the subject will have no previous experience with the pieces. (Author/BY)
Descriptors: Children, Individual Testing, Intelligence Tests, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewedLazarus, Philip J.; Novoa, Loriana. – Journal of Reading, 1987
Reviews the "Quick-Score Achievement Test" (Q-SAT), an individually administered measure of school achievement for use with students aged 7-18, which has two forms and yields scores for reading, writing, arithmetic, facts, and general achievement. (SKC)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Educational Testing, Individual Testing, Standardized Tests
Peer reviewedCaldwell, JoAnne – Journal of Reading, 1987
Concludes that the test has basic problems in construction, interpretation, validity, and reliability. (FL)
Descriptors: Cognitive Style, Individual Testing, Reading Instruction, Reading Tests
Peer reviewedYsseldyke, James E.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1973
A multitrait-multimethod matrix was used to ascertain the convergent and discriminant validity of the subtests of the Peabody Individual Achievement Test. Correlations among scores earned by educable mentally retarded children on PIAT and WRAT subtests were similar to those reported for retarded adolescents by Sitlington (1970). (Author)
Descriptors: Achievement, Achievement Tests, Educational Research, Exceptional Child Research

Direct link
