Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Group Testing | 6 |
Item Analysis | 6 |
Test Validity | 6 |
Test Reliability | 4 |
Testing Problems | 3 |
Achievement Tests | 2 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Evaluation Problems | 2 |
Item Response Theory | 2 |
Models | 2 |
Test Bias | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Camilli, Gregory | 1 |
Draper, John F. | 1 |
Green, Donald Ross | 1 |
Jiao, Hong | 1 |
Li, Ying | 1 |
Lissitz, Robert W. | 1 |
Peyser, Turkan Kumbaraci | 1 |
Phillips, Gary W. | 1 |
Waters, Brian K. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
California Achievement Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Phillips, Gary W. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2015
This article proposes that sampling design effects have potentially huge unrecognized impacts on the results reported by large-scale district and state assessments in the United States. When design effects are unrecognized and unaccounted for they lead to underestimating the sampling error in item and test statistics. Underestimating the sampling…
Descriptors: State Programs, Sampling, Research Design, Error of Measurement
Li, Ying; Jiao, Hong; Lissitz, Robert W. – Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 2012
This study investigated the application of multidimensional item response theory (IRT) models to validate test structure and dimensionality. Multiple content areas or domains within a single subject often exist in large-scale achievement tests. Such areas or domains may cause multidimensionality or local item dependence, which both violate the…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Science Tests, Item Response Theory, Measures (Individuals)
Camilli, Gregory – Educational Research and Evaluation, 2013
In the attempt to identify or prevent unfair tests, both quantitative analyses and logical evaluation are often used. For the most part, fairness evaluation is a pragmatic attempt at determining whether procedural or substantive due process has been accorded to either a group of test takers or an individual. In both the individual and comparative…
Descriptors: Alternative Assessment, Test Bias, Test Content, Test Format
Peyser, Turkan Kumbaraci
The possibility of using translations of American reading tests for the evaluation of pupils belonging to different foreign groups was explored. Two parallel forms of a reading comprehension test geared to United States high school graduates and college entrants and the translations of these into Turkish and the relative retranslations back into…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Content Area Reading, Culture Fair Tests, Foreign Students
Waters, Brian K. – 1975
This study empirically investigated the validity and utility of the stratified adaptive computerized testing model (stradaptive]developed by Weiss (1973). The model presents a tailored testing strategy based on Binet IQ measurement theory and Lord's (1972) modern test theory. Nationally normed School and College Ability Test Verbal analogy items…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Branching, Comparative Analysis
Green, Donald Ross; Draper, John F. – 1972
This paper considers the question of bias in group administered academic achievement tests, bias which is inherent in the instruments themselves. A body of data on the test of performance of three disadvantaged minority groups--northern, urban black; southern, rural black; and, southwestern, Mexican-Americans--as tryout samples in contrast to…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Bias, Comparative Testing, Educational Testing