Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Research | 2 |
| Language Usage | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Antisocial Behavior | 1 |
| Autism | 1 |
| Bias | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Interpersonal Competence | 1 |
| Rating Scales | 1 |
| Screening Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Massachusetts | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Massachusetts Comprehensive… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textPhelps, Richard P. – Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research, 2016
The Thomas B. Fordham Institute has released a report, "Evaluating the Content and Quality of Next Generation Assessments," ostensibly an evaluative comparison of four testing programs, the Common Core derived SBAC and PARCC, ACT's Aspire, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts' MCAS. Of course, anyone familiar with Fordham's past work…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Tests, Evaluation Research, Standardized Tests
Peer reviewed
Direct linkPandolfi, Vincent; Magyar, Caroline I.; Dill, Charles A. – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2010
The GARS-2 (Gilliam 2006) is widely used for autism screening; however, the validity of its three conceptually-derived subscales has not been evaluated. In this study, exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factor analyses of data from matched subgroups of the standardization sample did not support the GARS-2 subscale structure. EFAs identified…
Descriptors: Autism, Factor Analysis, Test Construction, Rating Scales
